ABCNEWS What Would You Do Has An Epic Fail In Texas

I read this article given to me by a Twitter friend, Donna and after reading and knowing that what John Quiñones used to do when he was a local reporter here in Los Angeles, there were several questions in my mind that need to be answered by Mr. Quiñones and ABC Television.

First of all, why Texas? This is an easy one to answer. Because the liberal media perception of Texas is its a state full of “redneck cowboy racists and bigots” therefore, perhaps if they went to “The Big Texan Steakhouse” because this is where all those cowboy bigots would surely congregate and they would out them on national television, thus proving a long held misconception about Texans.

Next, why did ABC prodecers use kids in the piece? Again easily answered. The number one reason they used children in the piece is to further the notion that gay people are born “gay.” The “actor” playing the boy, was 12 year old Anthony Ippolito.

Anthony Ippolito was handed a SCRIPT and told what to do and what to say to try to get a rise out of the people he was talking with on hidden camera. I guess in this instance it didn’t work, however I must admit that I have not seen the piece.

My next question would be, why did ABC have to hire actors to play the parts of the children? Their default answer would be that it was because they didn’t want to “stigmatize” any “actual children” that might actually be gay.

My answer would be that ABC hired actors because contrary to what the media try to spoon feed us all on a daily basis, there are not a bunch of gay 16 year olds running around auditioning for parts in television.

Why did I say 16 years old? Because I live in Los Angeles. My kids used to act. Its routine for producers to look for 16 to 18 year old poeple to play 12 to 14 year old parts.

This article goes on to state “Producers chose the iconic Amarillo restaurant after deciding to film down historic Route 66. The crew began filming May 8 in Springfield, Miss., then traveled to Weatherford, Okla., and wrapped shooting in Amarillo on Monday. Two segments were filmed in each town.”

This is just in case there are letters to the editors of ABC, local newspapers and other media outlets about what traspired at all the other locations they stopped at in between the Springfield and Amarillo locations but did not get the desired results.

They chose those two locations because its where they actually got people to say what the producers wanted to hear and edit to make Texans look like what ABC wants them to look like.

That’s the dirty little secret here. ABC gives John Quiñones a budget and sends him out on a mission. That mission is to make a show that gets people to believe that fantasy is reality. The people of Amarillo were victims here. They were indeed ambushed. JD

When placed in a tense or uncomfortable situation, people have a variety of reactions. Some become angry. Some step in to defend another person. Some simply walk away.

Patrons at The Big Texan Steak Ranch found out how they would react this week as guests on the ABC show, “What Would You Do?”

Producers chose the iconic Amarillo restaurant after deciding to film down historic Route 66. The crew began filming May 8 in Springfield, Miss., then traveled to Weatherford, Okla., and wrapped shooting in Amarillo on Monday. Two segments were filmed in each town.

Jovanna Billington, producer and creator of the piece, said the crew wanted to film quickly before anyone knew and chose small towns precisely for this reason.

“It was a small-town ambush,” she said.

Although the show is known for the controversial topics it sometimes features, the scenario on Monday was more of a light-hearted piece, said producer Robert Zepeda.

In the scenario, actors Nicolette Pierini, 9, and Anthony Ippolito, 12, both from New York, play a brother and sister selling sweet tea to patrons. Though the sign says $1 customers soon learn there is fine print and they are being charged for everything from Pierini taking their picture to cookies, napkins, straws and even drink umbrellas.

Billington said ideas for scenarios come from almost anything, from real-life experiences to topics pulled straight from the news. Zepeda said the other scenario used Saturday was chosen in part because of recent headlines regarding a vote scheduled for Thursday when the National Council of the Boy Scouts of America will decide if the organization should begin allowing openly gay scouts to participate in troops across the country.

In the scenario, a boy, played by Ippolito, decided to confide in fellow Boy Scouts that he thinks he’s gay. Once they left him alone and appearing defeated, many people stepped in and tried to lift the boy’s spirits, said host John Quiñones.

“It was a great day full of many, many different reactions,” said Quiñones.

1 Comment

Filed under Breaking News

Hello Donna Kathleen M

Just a quick note as to how the cloud works. I run Twitter API which automatically sends to Twitter. It sends this post to my FB and to my Pinterest as well. Google API. Google “Google.XML. It will school you in how the cloud works. LOL J

Leave a Comment

Filed under Breaking News

IRS Scandal Knocks On Door Of Oval Office

The White House acknowledged today that democrats and high level Obama cabinet members did know about the IRS doing investigations into “Tea Party” and other groups that were perceived enemies of the white house and President Obama.

In yet another colassal waffle, Obama and the white house said today that indeed they did know about the deliberate targeting by the IRS of conservative groups that wished to support republican candidates and conservative ideas.

The White House has changed its story about who knew what and when as it relates to the targeting of President Obama’s political enemies by the IRS.

While it might help with the press and public to crack down on the IRS as former President Bill Clinton once did, Obama may not be able to take on this key part of the Democratic constituency. Times have changed and so has the Democratic base.

That’s not a good thing. Prior to the story switch, the White House was able to hold the line that Team Obama had been direct and forthcoming about the IRS abuses and that the president and his top aides learned about the scandal in the news. They were just as shocked as everyone else.

But now we know that White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough was clued in about a damning report on IRS misconduct and that word was also sent to top aides to Treasury Secretary Jack Lew so his department could brace for the news. But White House Press Secretary Jay Carney was adamant that no one told President Obama.

There’s a question here about why the president’s top lawyer and chief of staff kept this news from him, even as they were spreading the word beyond the White House. One supposes it was to preserve plausible deniability for the president and to afford him the chance to express shock when word came out. It also bought Obama some more time to address the scandal.

There are some immediate repercussions to the changing story line.

First, it further damages the credibility of Carney and the White House communications team, which in recent weeks has had to fess up about misleading the press about a raid by Islamist militants on a U.S. diplomatic outpost in Libya and try to explain away the heavy-handed tactics used against reporters by the Obama Justice Department.

The president and his team have consistently limited their statements to the report on the wrongdoing, not the wrongdoing itself. It remains unclear if there had been any advance warnings sent to the White House about the misconduct itself, rather than just the report. This may prove important later when investigators are poring over emails and records, but for now it reinforces the sense that the administration is withholding.

And if it does ever come out that anyone in Obamaland had warning of the actual misconduct, legalistic answers will be little protection, especially from reporters and congressional investigators. As on the Benghazi raid, it wouldn’t be much help to rely on parsing.

Second, the Monday story shift raises some questions of competency. What kind of a White House counselor and chief of staff would try to keep a lid on a scandal that involves the most disliked federal agency targeting the president’s adversaries? Doing so in furtherance of a weak communications strategy would be very poor judgment indeed.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Breaking News, Daily Rant, Nitwits, Opinion, Politics, Stupid Human Tricks

IRS Story A Smokescreen To Knock Benghazi Off Front Page

It goes without saying that democrats and President Obama have willing accomplices in the media that get their marching orders from democrat operatives looking to control what is in the news and how it is covered.

The IRS targeting conservative political groups is a perfect example of how the news that Americans read and view is manipulated by the left and twisted into a a mishmash on mindless drivel that is talked about all day long at the water cooler in the offices of America as if it were gospel truth.

The attack on 9/11/2012 in which US Embassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans were killed were planned terrorist attacks.

Obama and Clinton both knew that these attacks were imminent and chose to do nothing to stop it. These are known facts.

In an attempt to contain damage to Obama’s re-election campaign, Hillary Clinton and her state department aides lied for more than a month and tried to claim it was because of a video posted on YouTube.

When that didn’t work and well after Obama had been re-elected, they claimed it was all political and it was the republicans trying to attack Hillary Clinton to ruin her chances in 2016, as if she had any chance anyway.

The media sent Barbra Boxer and Diane Feinstein out with comments like “I think that’s nonsense,” Feinstein said of Paul’s claim. “And I think the American people will think that’s nonsense.”

Meanwhile the American people are wanting answers to nagging questions on Benghazi.

Questions like, Why did the Obama administration say it was because of a video called “Innocence of Muslims” and have Nakoula Basseley Nakoula, the maker of the video arrested?

Why does Basseley remain in jail today?

The issue was all over Twitter, where one person commented, “It’s crystal clear that the terrorists who killed four Americans in Benghazi weren’t spurred on by an anti-Islam video, despite what administration officials wanted the public to believe. But nearly eight months after the attacks, ‘Innocence of Muslims’ filmmaker Makoula Basseley Nakoula still languishes in prison.”

All of this is to cover up what we all know was a cover up. To obscure what we all know to be fact, and every time the Benghazi story errupts and gets ready to blow, story like the one two days ago about the IRS attacking conservative political groups is leaked by Washington to knock Benghazi off the front page.

President Obama has not yet come to figure out that Americans were duped into electing him to a second and first term by the propaganda machine we call the main stream media.

Had the media not been so concerned with “making history” by electing the first half white president, Hillary Clinton would have won that election of 2008 by a landslide over that wig wearing hump John McCain.

Here we are five years later and the economy is in the toilet sans Wall Street, which is recording record highs almost daily because American business is taking advantage of Obama’s ineptitude with regard to the economy by producing the same amount of product with fewer employees.

That is something Americans will never understand. When companies lay off labor, their stock goes up because their overhead goes down.

But liberals in America keep pointing to Wall Street and saying “Look what a great job Obama is doing” when the reality is that Wall Street is doing good because of what Obama is not doing, putting Americans back to to work.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Breaking News, It's the Economy Stupid!, Obama, Opinion, Platitudes, Political humor, Politics, Stupid Human Tricks

Rush Limbaugh May Leave WABC Radio

Rush Limbaugh insists it’s not his fault that ad revenue has dropped at his flagship WABC radio station — and if his boss keeps saying it is, Rush just may pack up his megadittoes and leave.

In New York, that would very likely take him to WOR, which would create the biggest shakeup in city talk radio since WOR scooped up Bob Grant after WABC fired him in 1995.

Limbaugh’s contract with WABC expires at the end of the year.

Lew Dickey, the CEO of WABC parent company Cumulus, has said Limbaugh’s controversial comments have diminished ad revenue for the past year — and the slump remains a “residual hangover” for the station.

But the rift blew open over the weekend when a source close to the

Limbaugh told the Daily News: “Lew needs someone to blame, (so) he’s pointing fingers instead of fixing his own sales problem.”
The roots of this simmering dispute go back to February, 2012, when

Limbaugh called law student Sandra Fluke a “slut” after she pressed D.C. lawmakers to mandate insurance coverage of birth control.

Media Matters and other progressive groups called for advertisers to drop Limbaugh’s show — and several hundred, including Sears, Geico, John Deere, Netflix, Capitol One and the New York Lottery, did, the group said.

Limbaugh has said the departees were replaced, and a source close to the show said revenue was “very minimally impacted in the short term.”

Overall, Cumulus was “hit pretty hard by this,” he said. Company revenue for that period fell 3.5% and Dickey estimated 1% was due to Rush.

He said last May he hoped the problem would disappear. But it hasn’t, he said.

“There has been residual hangover … in terms of advertisers sitting out,” Dickey said in March. “Clearly that’s had an impact. … That’s something that we are dealing with on an ongoing basis.”

Nonsense, said the source close to the Limbaugh show: “Dickey keeps complaining about falling revenue, but his stations have long lagged behind their competitors in sales by a substantial margin. Rush Limbaugh’s ratings have outperformed every other program on WABC and many other Cumulus stations for years.”

A spokesman for Cumulus said there would be no comment. “Cumulus has the premier talk radio distribution platform in the United States and doesn’t comment on negotiations with talent under contract.”

Talk radio has suffered from a serious ad slump since the recession began in 2008. But WABC has opened a substantial lead in recent years over its primary news/talk rival in New York, WOR. In the latest Arbitron ratings, WABC averaged 2.8% of the audience to 1.2% for WOR.

Last year, however, WOR was purchased by radio megagiant Clear Channel, which syndicates Limbaugh’s show through its company, Premiere.

If Limbaugh leaves Cumulus, which now carries him on 40 stations in 36 markets, the source at his show confirms he would be looking for other stations in those markets.

Limbaugh began his national career on WABC in 1988, and his show is widely credited with launching the modern surge of talk radio into a major political force.

WABC, meanwhile, blossomed from a struggling talk station into a national symbol of talk radio’s staunch conservatism.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Breaking News