Funny Obama Air Force One Coakley We here at the BrokenCountry have a few questions for President Obama. How much of the taxpayers money is President Obama spending to go to Massachusetts and stump for Coakley? Is the tab being picked up by the Democratic National Committee? What other pressing issues is he ignoring to make sure that the democrats maintain a “super majority” in the senate? Why is this such an important issue to Obama?

These are just a few questions that I want asked and answered. I think this may be a first. I am probably wrong, because I am wrong quite frequently (but at least I can admit it) but I cannot remember a sitting president traveling to stump for a party candidate in a mid-term election.

It should also be noted that, should Coakley lose the race, it will look incredibly bad for President Obama. Obama is pulling out all the stops for Coakley, and if she doesn’t come up the winner in Massachusetts, a state where virtually every congressman sent to Washington is a democrat, it will be incredibly embarrassing and a virtual rebuke of Obama’s liberal agenda.

By going to Massachusetts, Obama is almost condemning the democrat party should Coakley lose. House and senate democrats will have no choice but to turn their back on Obama’s agenda if his presence cannot produce a victory for Coakley. Could it be that Obama is so egocentric that he thinks that his mere presence makes it a slam dunk for Coakley? Even after the Copenhagen, Olympic Games debacle?

One can only wonder. We see it as a republican victory even is Scott Borwn loses the election. Think about it. Here is the late Ted Kennedy’s senate seat. A seat not held by a republican since 1955, and there is a good chance that a republican is going to replace a Kennedy in one of the most liberal states in the union.

The liberal naysayers and Obamatrons will be out in force with either outcome of the election. If Coakley wins, the libs will call it a victory for Obama and his agenda. If Brown wins, they will say it was because of republicans running a smear campaign and spending millions of dollars in a state that they would normally ignore.

But not a word will be said about the expense of sending a sitting president, in Air Force One, with his three support aircraft, a second Air Force One as a decoy for the terrorists, three hundred people that make up the presidential detail, military escort including aircraft, and the press pool to Massachusetts to stump for a senate seat. JD

Post to Twitter

Tags: brown, campaign, coakley, cost, dollars, expense, Obama, Scott, stump, tax

Whats eating Barack Obama

Oh the humanity.  How much longer will we tolerate this buffoon we call President Obama?   He is an embarrassment to America. President Obama’s charm offensive didn’t work in New Jersey or Virginia, where Republicans won crucial gubernatorial races in November. Will it work in Massachusetts?

That remains to be seen, as Obama puts his prestige on the line again when he goes to the Bay State on Sunday to stump for Democratic nominee Martha Coakley, who is in a dead heat with Republican candidate Scott Brown for Ted Kennedy’s Senate seat.

“It’s white-knuckle time,” Democratic operative Phil Johnston told the Boston Herald. “This is an election we have to win. It’s key to everything the Obama administration wants to do. The stakes are high.”

In fact, the stakes are even higher for the president than they were in last year’s gubernatorial races, as he seeks to avoid losing a critical 60th vote in the Senate for his signature health care overhaul that is nearing the finish line in Congress.

If Brown wins Tuesday, Republicans pick up their 41st vote, which would be enough to sustain a filibuster and possibly kill the reform bill.

The most recent poll has Brown leading by 4 percentage points, and the Republican state senator reportedly is raising money at a rate of $1 million a day. Meanwhile, Coakley’s campaign is under fire for the way she’s run her campaign, going from front-runner to barely competitive after taking it easy following her primary victory in December.

The president’s decision to hit the campaign trail again is a stunning reversal from what the White House had been saying in recent days and reflects the concerns Democrats have over their chances Tuesday.

John Feehery, a Republican consultant, told the Herald that the trip reeks of desperation for both Coakley and Obama.

“It’s a complete meltdown, and it doesn’t seem to me that it will have much of an impact,” Feehery said, adding that Democrats he’s talked to are blaming Coakley. “You can always tell when Democrats are going to lose because they start blaming the candidate.”

But White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said Friday that Obama believes his visit will be “productive.”

“I think it’s a referendum on whose side are you on,” Gibbs said, dismissing suggestions the race is a referendum on the president himself. “I think the president sees a pretty clear distinction between a candidate in Martha Coakley who’s going to fight for Massachusetts and a candidate on the other side who feels comfortable fighting for the insurance industry and big banks.”

A spokeswoman for Brown, in response to Obama’s planned visit, called Coakley a “rubber stamp for the political machine.”

Before deciding to visit the state this weekend, the president did come to Coakley’s aid by cutting an online video for her, calling on supporters to put on their “walking shoes” and bring out people to vote.

“In Washington, I’m fighting to curb the abuses of a health insurance industry that routinely denies care,” Obama said. “I’m fighting for financial reforms to stop Wall Street from playing havoc with our economy. I’m fighting to create a new, clean energy economy.

“And it’s clear now that the outcome of these and other fights will probably rest on one vote in the United States Senate.”

Post to Twitter

Tags: care, coakley, health, important, lose, majority, massachusetts, Obama, senate, stump