Daily Archives: April 8, 2010

Man Forced To Pay ‘Crash Tax’ For Emergency Response

Cary Feldman was charged for emergency response after being in a car accident.

This is what happens when democrats rule the roost. You end up being taxed for everything, including emergency responses.

If you get into a car accident and 911 is called, you may get billed for the emergency response. Cash-strapped communities are sending out bills to cover the costs of fire trucks responding to crashes. As CBS 2 Investigator Dave Savini reports, often times it does not matter whether you caused the accident or are the victim.

Cary Feldman received one of these bills last summer. He was driving his motor scooter in Chicago Heights when he was struck from behind. He was fine, but someone else called 911, and a fire truck was sent to the scene.

Feldman says it was unnecessary.

“There was no fire, there was no explosion, there was no debris,” Feldman said. “From what I saw, they came, they saw, and they left.”

The fire department then sent him a $200 bill for that fire truck response.

“We’re paying taxes for these services,” said Feldman. “We don’t need to have a second tax.”

Motorists across the country are calling these fees a “crash tax” — alleged strong arm tactics angering many, especially when the accidents they are being billed for are not their fault.

Nine states have created laws banning these fees. Illinois has no ban on these so-called “crash taxes.”

In fact, pending Illinois legislation would allow municipalities to charge up to $250 an hour for an emergency response.

Illinois Representative Karen Yarbrough is working on this issue and wants the pending legislation killed.

“Bad bill, very bad bill,” said Yarbrough. “This is just another way to reach into a consumer’s pocket.”

“I think the State of Illinois needs to take some actions to stop this from happening,” said Feldman.

Aside from the cost, there is concern that people will be afraid to call 911. That’s what happened last month in South Carolina. A couple tried using a hose to put out their house fire in order to avoid being billed by the fire department.

Once you’re billed, as Feldman learned, there is no process to fight it. There is no court date. You just have to pay the fee, or the consequences.

“They’ve been harassing me,” said Feldman who tried to get Chicago Heights officials to drop the bill.

He says that instead, officials were, “sending me letters and they even turned it over to collections without sending a final notice.”

He finally paid the $200 to avoid credit rating problems.

“So this is what I call extortion. This is how they get you to pay it,” Feldman said.

The person who hit Feldman was also billed, but only $100, because he lives in the community. Feldman says insurance would not cover the bill.

Chicago Heights Fire Chief Thomas Martello says they do not charge these extra fees for house fires. The chief also says money is tight and departments are using creative funding methods.

Matteson and Park Forest are examples of two other communities that bill for emergency response.

Naperville and Schaumburg are examples of communities that do not bill extra for fire truck services.

Some communities only bill the offender. And there are communities that only bill non-residents, those who live in other towns, figuring their residents already pay taxes on local services.

“I’m going to call it a scam,” said Feldman. “Just a way to make money instead of helping people.”

1 Comment

Filed under Bogus News, Breaking News, Obama, Political humor, Stupid Human Tricks

Arkansas Teen Sues Mom for Hacking Facebook Account

Suing your parents isn’t just for celebrities anymore–a 16-year-old Arkansas boy is suing his mother for hacking into his Facebook account and allegedly posting slanderous remarks.

KATV-TV reports that Denise New of Arkadelphia is facing harassment charges from her 16-year-old. Her son, who lives with his grandmother, also requested a no-contact order. Prior to this issue, New and her son reportedly had a “great relationship,” despite their living arrangements.

According to the boy, his mother hacked into his Facebook and email accounts, then changed both passwords. She also allegedly posted remarks that involved slander and information about his personal life.

New admits to changing the passwords, but denies hacking–she claims he left his account logged in on her computer. She also admits to making “maybe three, maybe four actual postings,” but says the rest of it was a “conversation” between her, her son, and his friends.

New reportedly “hacked” her son’s Facebook account because she was disturbed with the things he was posting–including a post that suggested he had driven home one night at 95 mph because he had been upset with a girl.

New plans on fighting the charges, as she believes she was fully within her legal rights as a parent to monitor her son’s online behavior.

“Oh yeah, I’m going to fight it. If I have to go even higher up, I’m going to. I’m not gonna let this rest. I think this could be a precedent-setting moment for parents,” she told KATV-TV.

Prosecutors approved the harassment charges on March 26, and New faces a court date of May 12. Prosecutors declined to comment on the case because of the boy’s status as a minor, but did make a statement saying that New’s alleged statements justified the charge.

Such a case almost seems dead in the water–why wouldn’t a parent be allowed to monitor his or her child’s online activity? As for the 16-year-old…well, come on, people. Be careful who you friend!

Leave a Comment

Filed under Breaking News