Has Google ruined the way we use the internet?
Posted by webmasterNov 22

The Almighty Google. I remember using the old college bulletin board systems around the country on my old 2400 kb modem. funny now, but back then it only took about ten minutes to download a 100,000 kilobyte file. A person could get up, make a sandwich, call some friends and engage in some chit chat, and come back just as the download had finished.
Then along came the internet. It changed everything. ISP’s like Prodigy, Compuserve and America Online were all the rave. I personally liked Compuserve when it was all text based and you could hack around and have a lot of fun with the newbies of the day. There was a time and a day when the only game in town was AOL. It sucked man. To get on the internet you had to jump through hoops while juggling balls and playing spoons.
Things became a lot easier when Netscape and independent ISP’s like Earthlink entered the picture. The internet, still in its infancy, was a glorious place to spend hours online playing games, hitting new websites and meeting new people around the world. I remember at COMDEX in Las Vegas in maybe 1995, Bill Gates was telling the world why Windows 95 was not going to debut until 1996, and he was asked about the internet and whether Microsoft would produce a web browser. Gates response was to say something like “The internet is a passing fad that will never catch on” or something like that. What an idiot.
Then came Yahoo. Before yahoo you could run scripting programs like Web Ferret to search the internet, but there really was no real way to look for web content. Yahoo changed all that. It was great. You could simply type in a phrase or a word, and get a whole host of random results, and somewhere in the fray, you would find what you were looking for.
But doing a search like that was not an efficient way to make money off of the internet. If there were only a way to steer people toward specific websites, more importantly, specific websites that paid Yahoo for search page placement, well then you could generate revenue off of the search.
This was great for Yahoo and Yahoo shareholders, because this is what Yahoo turned into with regard to its search engine. Many consider this way of thinking the beginning of the end of Yahoo. But it was horrible for people like me that don’t use the web to play games, watch porn or scam innocent people out of money.
Web searching became tedious, monotonous work. One would have to go through countless pages of nonsense to simply find a part for a car door, or a gift for a friend. People often forget about the early days of personal computing, when there was no internet. But the internet was what made people want to go out and purchase a PC in the first place, and Yahoo in my opinion, had successfully helped to ruin the fun for a time.
Enter Google. I had a friend attending Cal State Berkeley. She called me one day and as we were talking about computers, she asked me if I had heard of Google. I asked her what the hell a Google was. She said its a search engine that these guy here at Berkeley made. She missed it by a few miles, it was actually Stanford, but nonetheless, I used it and I was stunned.
Suddenly, searching the internet had become a breeze. I could type in the most obscure thing I could think of, and presto, I had instant, pertinent results. I once found a lock bolt for the front door of my house on Google. The door set cost more than six hundred dollars. Surely the bolt must be available as a separate part. Google found it and it was less than five miles from my house. It cost eleven dollars. I had an RV and the refrigerator control board burned out. Camping World wanted three hundred dollars for the part and another hundred to put it in. I found it on Google for fifty six dollars and it took me twenty minutes to install.
Now here is the questions portion. Has anyone noticed any difference with their search results? Because when I search things out, I get nothing but sites that pay Google for their search results placement, and the results are not even remotely close to that which I am looking for in the first place. This is almost always the case when I am researching old news stories for articles here on brokencountry.com. I use correct syntax, sometimes I will even quote the lines in a particular story and not get the right results.
My next question would be how Google indexes its news articles. I use Google to get my news, because the visual media is so full of shit that it has become impossible to watch. Articles on Google News seem to go only to the major news outlets, which stands to reason because after all, they are news outlets. But there are many articles I find from some of the smaller news outlets around the country that are rarely displayed on Google’s front page and go widely unreported.
I’m just wondering if anyone else has noticed this trend, because this is one of the many reasons that Yahoo fell by the wayside. They decided that money was more important than accuracy. If that is the case, perhaps its time for a new search engine. Twitter comes to mind. Maybe the fine folks at twitter should create a sort of back to basics type search engine. This might work well for people like me. The schmendricks of society that ask for nothing more than accuracy on the internet. Let me know what you think. JD
Tags: Google, internet, ruin, search
JD, have you had the chance to read about Google Dashboard. If not, here's an article I found in my local newspaper.
http://www.statesman.com/business/content/busines...
I know. I use Google dashboard and web tools. What I am saying is that google used to index their articles according to content. It seems they no longer so this. I am just wanting to know if anyone else has noticed this. JD
Just found this in my email box and will omit the authors name and email as requested.
Google is watching everything you do online. They are making a profile of your internet use. Everything you search, your interests hobbies, etc. So when you search google, you are getting what Googles profile thinks you want to see rather then what you want to learn. Example, if Google see's that you use WIKI a lot, when your search out an celebrity it will load the WIKI profile at the top of the page.
This is good if you are just the average web user, but for people like us that own blogs and are looking to do research, it can be quite a bother. I suggest using a stand alone browser like Chrome or FIrefox, that you use for nothing but internet research and do not allow cookies to be saved and have the history deleted when you close it. This is the only way to get clean internet content anymore from any search engine.
I have noticed this with my site too. It seems to be based on who gets the most hits as opposed to who has the most pertinent content. It makes it hard for people with smaller sites like mine to get noticed. Perhaps we should all cave to google and simply start paying for page placement.
Dear John,
Yes, I have noticed this. I created another email account to avoid that for a while but I think your friend's method is way better. Also sites like GoDaddy offer discounts on multiple domains even if you will only be using one. This obviously is so that you will get more traffic directed to your one site that you are using as they all automatically take people to your main site.
Is this the same Tom that attacks my content all the time? What is your site? I would like to see it. As for my site, it was down for about two weeks, so of course the hits have fallen off. But I am back up to about 2000 a day and it is getting better each day too. I used to get at least 10,000 hits a day a few years ago, but since Google changed the way it indexes sites, I am lucky to get 3,000 a day. JD
Yes I know. But there was never a need to do that before. I didn't need redirects to generate traffic. My content is slowly working its way back into the Google index, so it continues to get better each day. JD