Openly racist Democrats

Taken from Wikipedia:

The American Civil War (1861–1865), also known as the War Between the States and several other names, was a civil war in the United States of America. Eleven Southern slave states declared their secession from the U.S. and formed the Confederate States of America (the Confederacy). Led by Jefferson Davis, they fought against the U.S. federal government (the “Union”), which was supported by all the free states and the five border slave states.

In the presidential election of 1860, the Republican Party, led by Abraham Lincoln, had campaigned against the expansion of slavery beyond the states in which it already existed. The Republican victory in that election resulted in seven liberal Southern states declaring their secession from the Union even before Lincoln took office on March 4, 1861. Both the outgoing and incoming U.S. administrations rejected secession, regarding it as rebellion.

I lifted this excerpt from Wiki because the behavior of the African American race in these United States continues to perplex me. It was the Southern Democrats that wanted to keep slaves. It was northern Republicans which included Abraham Lincoln that wanted to put an end to slavery. Even in the sixties and seventies, there were still democrats in the south that wanted to keeps blacks segregated from whites.

How can anyone forget Democratic Governor of the state of Alabama George Wallace saying ” In the name of the greatest people that have ever trod this earth, I draw the line in the dust and toss the gauntlet before the feet of tyranny, and I say segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever. ” Has everyone forgotten Governor Wallace on the steps of the University of Alabama having to step aside under the threat of the National Guard to let the black students enroll in school?

Or what about one of my all time favorite liberal democrats, Senator Robert Byrd. Again I referenced Wikipedia and lifted this excerpt about Mr. Byrd. “Byrd joined the Ku Klux Klan when he was 24 in 1942. His local chapter unanimously elected him Exalted Cyclops.[2]

According to Byrd, a Klan official told him, “You have a talent for leadership, Bob… The country needs young men like you in the leadership of the nation.” Byrd later recalled, “suddenly lights flashed in my mind! Someone important had recognized my abilities! I was only 23 or 24 years old, and the thought of a political career had never really hit me. But strike me that night, it did.”[2] Byrd held the titles Kleagle (recruiter) and Exalted Cyclops.[2]

In 1944, Byrd wrote to segregationist Mississippi Senator Theodore Bilbo:[6]

I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side… Rather I should die a thousand times, and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds.”

Franklin Delano Roosevelt (to democrats one of the greatest liberals of all time) rounded up an entire race of people (the Japanese) and PUT THEM IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS! Roosevelt unilaterally and knowingly enacted Japanese Internment through the use of presidential Executive Orders 9066 and 9102 during the early years of the war. Correct me if I am wrong, but the U.S. was also at war with Italy and Germany. At that time there were more than a two million Italians in this country and no telling how many Germans. These orders single-handedly led to the imprisonment of an estimated 120,000 law abiding Americans of Japanese ancestry, the overwhelming majority of them natural born second and third generation American citizens. Countless innocents lost their property, fortunes, and, in the case of an unfortunate few, even their lives as a result of Roosevelt’s internment camps, camps that have been accurately described as America’s concentration camps.

Hugo Black: A former Democrat Senator from Alabama and liberal U.S. Supreme Court Justice appointed by FDR, Hugo Black had a lengthy history of hate group activism. Black was a member of the Ku Klux Klan in the 1920′s and gained his legal fame defending Klansmen under prosecution for racial murders. In one prominent case, Black provided legal representation to Klansman Edwin Stephenson for the hate-induced murder of a Catholic priest in Birmingham. A jury composed of several Klan members acquitted Stephenson of the murder, reportedly after Black expressed Klan gestures to the jury during the trial. In 1926 Black sought and won election as a Democrat to the United States Senate after campaigning heavily to Klan membership. He is said to have told one Klan audience “I desire to impress upon you as representatives of the real Anglo-Saxon sentiment that must and will control the destinies of the stars and stripes, that I want your counsel.” In the Senate Black became a staunch supporter of the liberal New Deal initiatives of FDR and a solid opponent of civil rights legislation, including a filibuster of an anti-lynching measure.

Senator Ernest Hollings, D-SC: Hollings is liberal Democrat Senator from South Carolina who is also notorious for his use of racial slurs. He rose out of the Democrat Party’s segregationist wing in the 1960′s as governor of South Carolina. While in office as governor, Hollings personally led the opposition to lunch counter integration in his state. The New York Times reported on March 17, 1960 that then-governor Hollings “warned today that South Carolina would not permit ‘explosive’ manifestations in connection with Negro demands for lunch-counter services.” According to the article, Hollings gave a speech in which he “challenged President Eisenhower’s contention that minorities had the right to engage in certain types of demonstrations” against segregation. In the speech Hollings described the Republican president as “confused” and asserted that Eisenhower had done “great damage to peace and good order” by supporting the rights of minorities to protest segregation at the lunch counters.

Representative Dick Gephardt, D-MO: Gephardt, the former Democrat Minority Leader in the U.S. House of Representatives, gave several speeches to a St. Louis area hate group during his early years as a representative. According to the St. Louis Post-Dispatch, Gephardt spoke before the Metro South Citizens Council, a now defunct white supremacist organization, during his early years as a congressman. Newsmax.com further reported that Gephardt had openly asked the group for an endorsement of his candidacy during one of his many visits with the organization. Gephardt has long avoided questions about his past affiliation with this group.

Lee P. Brown: Brown, Bill Clinton’s former drug czar and Democrat mayor of Houston, engaged in racist campaigning designed to suppress Hispanic voter turnout during his 2001 reelection bid. Brown faced challenger Orlando Sanchez, a Hispanic Republican who drew heavy support from the Hispanic community during the general election. Two weeks prior to the runoff, Brown’s campaign printed racist signs designed to intimidate Hispanic voters. The signs featured a photograph of Sanchez and the words “Anti-Hispanic.” The signs drew harsh criticism from Hispanic leaders as their message was designed to intimidate and confuse Hispanic voters.

A little known fact of history involves the heavy opposition to the civil rights movement by several prominent Democrats. Similar historical neglect is given to the important role Republicans played in supporting the civil rights movement. A calculation of 26 major civil rights votes from 1933 through the 1960′s civil rights era shows that Republicans favored civil rights in approximately 96% of the votes, whereas the Democrats opposed them in 80% of the votes! These facts are often intentionally overlooked by the left wing Democrats for obvious reasons. In some cases, the Democrats have told flat out lies about their shameful record during the civil rights movement.

Democrat Senators organized the record Senate filibuster of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Included among the organizers were several prominent and well known liberal Democrat standard bearers including:
- Robert Byrd, current senator from West Virginia
- J. William Fulbright, Arkansas senator and political mentor of Bill Clinton
- Albert Gore Sr., Tennessee senator, father and political mentor of Al Gore. Gore Jr. has been known to lie about his father’s opposition to the Civil Rights Act.
- Sam Ervin, North Carolina senator of Watergate hearings fame
- Richard Russell, famed Georgia senator and later President Pro Tempore

The complete list of the 21 Democrats who opposed the Civil Rights Act of 1964 includes Senators:

- Hill and Sparkman of Alabama
- Fulbright and McClellan of Arkansas
- Holland and Smathers of Florida
- Russell and Talmadge of Georgia
- Ellender and Long of Louisiana
- Eastland and Stennis of Mississippi
- Ervin and Jordan of North Carolina
- Johnston and Thurmond of South Carolina
- Gore Sr. and Walters of Tennessee
- H. Byrd and Robertson of Virginia
- R. Byrd of West Virginia

Democrat opposition to the Civil Rights Act was substantial enough to literally split the party in two. A whopping 40% of the House Democrats VOTED AGAINST the Civil Rights Act, while 80% of Republicans SUPPORTED it. Republican support in the Senate was even higher. Similar trends occurred with the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which was supported by 82% of House Republicans and 94% of Senate Republicans. The same Democrat standard bearers took their normal racists stances, this time with Senator Fulbright leading the opposition effort.

It took the hard work of Republican Senate Minority Leader Everett Dirksen and Republican Whip Thomas Kuchel to pass the Civil Rights Act (Dirksen was presented a civil rights accomplishment award for the year by the head of the NAACP in recognition of his efforts). Upon breaking the Democrat filibuster of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, Republican Dirksen took to the Senate floor and exclaimed “The time has come for equality of opportunity in sharing in government, in education, and in employment. It will not be stayed or denied. It is here!” (Full text of speech). Sadly, Democrats and revisionist historians have all but forgotten (and intentionally so) that it was Republican Dirksen, not the divided Democrats, who made the Civil Rights Act a reality. Dirksen also broke the Democrat filibuster of the 1957 Civil Rights Act that was signed by Republican President Eisenhower.

Outside of Congress, the three most notorious opponents of school integration were all Democrats:
- Orval Faubus, Democrat Governor of Arkansas and one of Bill Clinton’s political heroes
- George Wallace, Democrat Governor of Alabama
- Lester Maddox, Democrat Governor of Georgia

The most famous of the school desegregation standoffs involved Governor Faubus. Democrat Faubus used police and state forces to block the integration of a high school in Little Rock, Arkansas. The standoff was settled and the school was integrated only after the intervention of Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower.

Even the Democrat Party organization resisted integration and refused to allow minority participation for decades. Exclusion of minorities was the general rule of the Democrat Party of many states for decades, especially in Texas. This racist policy reached its peak under the New Deal in the southern and western states, often known as the New Deal Coalition region of FDR. The Supreme Court in Nixon v. Herndon declared the practice of “white primaries” unconstitutional in 1927 after states had passed laws barring Blacks from participating in Democrat primaries. But the Democrat Parties did not yield to the Court’s order. After Nixon v. Herndon, Democrats simply made rules within the party’s individual executive committees to bar minorities from participating, which were struck down in Nixon v. Condon in 1932. The Democrats, in typical racist fashion, responded by using state parties to pass rules barring blacks from participation. This decision was upheld in Grovey v. Townsend, which was not overturned until 1944 by Smith v. Allwright. The Texas Democrats responded with their usual ploys and turned to what was known as the “Jaybird system” which used private Democrat clubs to hold white-only votes on a slate of candidates, which were then transferred to the Democrat party itself and put on their primary ballot as the only choices. Terry v. Adams overturned the Jaybird system, prompting the Democrats to institute blocks of unit rule voting procedures as well as the infamous literacy tests and other Jim Crow regulations to specifically block minorities from participating in their primaries. In the end, it took 4 direct Supreme Court orders to end the Democrat’s “white primary” system, and after that it took countless additional orders, several acts of Congress, and a constitutional amendment to tear down the Jim Crow codes that preserved the Democrat’s white primary for decades beyond the final Supreme Court order ruling it officially unconstitutional.

Another Nixon is the reason for this post. Richard Milhous Nixon. There is yet another movie about Richard Nixon opening this weekend which tries to vilify Nixon and make him out to be a paranoid sycophant. Enough already. When are we going to see a movie showing what murdering drunks the Kennedy’s are? How about a movie about Hugo Black! A member of the KKK appointed to the Supreme Court by FDR and the liberally held congress and senate which ignored his affiliation with the Klan. Or JFK banging Marilyn Monroe? Camelot . . .. The only Camelot JFK knew was in his trousers. What a fucking joke. Camelot. What about the Bay of Pigs in Cuba? Make a movie about that.

All of the liberal democrats mentioned above are on record for their racist thinking. I have researched racist republicans and all I can find is paranoid accusation that are baseless and without merit. Amazing.
Thats all I have to say ’bout that. JD

3 Comments

Filed under Broken Society

3 Responses to Openly racist Democrats

  1. Pissed Off

    Racism will always exist, as long as their are people who frivolously throw around the race card. We must never forget what happened in history so we are not doomed to repeat what once happened. I think we need to keep the divisive lines at our boarders. After all its boarders that define what we are throughout the world. Our language and culture (If I may).
    Nowadays I can’t help but notice, (and I make no apologies for stating the obvious, that the Democrats consistently use the race card, not for any legitimate reason, but for their own political agenda. And I think its dispicapal. When Sen. L. Louise Lucas said she could finally tell her children that “racism is alive and well”. There was no basis for her to make that statement other than the fact Mitt Romney held a speech at the NAACP.All I could think to myself was saying to her ” thanks to people like you, Senator Lucas that indeed racism is alive and well”.
    I’m no fan of Romney, or Obama or Democrat or Republican, which makes it easier to see contradictions, double standards and the fact it seems our government has become totally oblivious of the fact that they are public servants of and for The People of the United States of America. I think that’s where We the People need to start getting our country back on track, by reminding the government who they work for.

  2. JJT

    Personally, i'm not a republican or a democrat. I think both parties are different digits on the same hand of the same corporate arm. Neither party seems interested in representing people, but corporations. And racism, which scientifically only really exists on the human surface(skin/hair/features) sadly will still exist socially and systematically. But common sense, through the absence of generalities,will prevail.
    Which brings me to your comment…"the behavior of the African-American race…continues to perplex me."

    I hope you realize that this comment is a very generalized, ill-informed, and ill-conceived statement. Though i'm glad you are sharing your opinions and ideas, i believe you need to have more extensive communication with African-Americans before you assume to know their perspectives, or "behavior", as you described.

    This concept you have, that African-Americans think the same, act the same, share one brain apparently, shows you haven't had much communication with African-Americans from around the country. Just because you personally haven't encountered African-Americans with opinions different from the perspective that you feel is the "African-American" one , doesn't mean other ideas, concepts, or behaviors don't exist.

    Just like every other culture, African-Americans don't speak with one mouth, feel with one heart, or act with one pair of hands. Your comment sounds just as uninformed as if someone were to describe such a thing as "white" behavior.

  3. MSM

    The whole two party system fuel's the same fire that keeps racism burning. It's a label you can slap on someone "republican" or "democrat". "us" or "them". blanket statements abound and the idea of individuality is lost. I cringe every time I hear someone make a blanket statement about "democrats", "republicans", "women", "blacks", you name it. we don't need the divisive lines you draw.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>