Archive for November, 2007

So here is what this story is not telling you. The people that are causing all the problems in France are the MUSLIM IMMIGRANTS from French Algiers and other parts of North africa.

Another thing that seems to be intentionally left out of the article is exactly why they are rioting. Although the article does mention unempoyment as the root cause, the real reason that the young muslim population are rioting is because the French Government wants them to get off of their collective asses and get a job!!!

Thats right. They have come to France and they don’t want to work. The recent wave of Muslim immigrants have come to France so they won’t have to work. They are decimating the welfare system and creating ghetto’s all over France. They refuse to get jobs.

They complain to the French government that there is no work for them but at the same time they will not speak french even though a lot of them know the language. They rob cheat and steal. They have created their own underground economy and hide every cent they can from the french government all the while using ALL of their social programs to live for free.

Sound familiar? It sort of echo’s the very thing that is going on here with illegal immigration, right? JD

PARIS — Clashes between youths and riot police in a suburb north of Paris, a reminder of rampant street violence that hit France two years ago, are rekindling a debate over how to integrate the country’s increasingly marginalized immigrant population.

On Wednesday, inhabitants of Villiers-le-Bel — which is halfway between Paris and Charles de Gaulle International Airport — awoke yet again to a smashed-up neighborhood. Bands of young people set cars on fire in the suburb for a third night Tuesday, but officials said the violence was less intense than the two previous nights. Interior Minister Michèle Alliot-Marie said 39 people were arrested overnight. Six police officers were wounded during the first two nights of clashes as youths used BB guns and threw Molotov cocktails, Ms. Alliot-Marie said Tuesday.

President Nicolas Sarkozy insisted Wednesday that rioters who shot at police would be brought to justice. “So that things are very clear: What has happened is absolutely unacceptable,” Mr. Sarkozy, said after meeting with a wounded police captain hospitalized in Eaubonne, north of Paris. The president was meeting Wednesday morning with the families of the two teenagers, as well as the mayor of Villiers-le-Bel before having a security meeting with his top ministers.

Ahead of his election in May, Mr. Sarkozy promised to create a “Marshall Plan” to revive the economy of France’s poor suburbs, where much of a large immigrant population from North and sub-Saharan Africa lives and where the jobless rate is two to three times the national average.

Since he took office, Mr. Sarkozy has focused on other issues, such as overhauling the justice, university and pension systems, but the new bout of violence is likely to pose a more urgent challenge.
Rioting continued in the Paris suburbs, despite appeals for calm from the families of two teenage boys whose deaths this past weekend triggered the unrest. Video courtesy of Reuters.

“We are sitting on a tinderbox,” Clichy-sous-Bois Mayor Claude Dilain said on French radio Tuesday. “A spark can set the place on fire.”

Clichy-sous-Bois, also north of Paris, was the stage of some of the most violent clashes in November 2005. Those riots were set off when two teenagers who were trying to escape the police were electrocuted and died in a power substation in Clichy. An investigation into whether the police failed to lend assistance to the teenagers is still going on.

This week’s violence in Villiers-le-Bel was set off Sunday when two teenagers, riding a small motorbike, collided with a police car and died. A prosecutor is investigating the incident, but said preliminary findings showed the crash was a road accident.

In Villiers-le-Bel, about half of the population lives in subsidized projects and the jobless rate stands at 19% compared with a national average of 8.4%. Foreigners account for about 30% of the inhabitants.

Fadela Amara, France’s minister in charge of urban policy, was to outline her plan for the suburbs in January, and it remains to be seen whether her proposals will be unveiled earlier in the wake of this week’s violence.

While he was interior minister, between 2002 and 2003, Mr. Sarkozy halted a plan introduced by his Socialist predecessor to allocate more resources to local police so they could be involved in social outreach activities. He said police had to focus on re-establishing law and order. “Organizing rugby games — that’s good, but it’s not the prime role of the police,” Mr. Sarkozy said at the time.

But with the rioting in Villiers-le-Bel, the recurrent debate over the lack of police presence in poor suburbs is resurfacing. Some French politicians, including members of Mr. Sarkozy’s ruling UMP party, said the use of riot squads has created a vicious, violent cycle.

Hughes Portelli, a UMP senator and the mayor of Ermont, a suburb near Villiers-le-Bel where seven cars were torched between Sunday and Tuesday, said he needed more, well-trained police “who know the area and do not leave at 6 p.m.”

“When there are tensions in a neighborhood, I am often left calling the antiriot police,” he said Tuesday in a telephone interview. “Some do a good job at restoring calm, but quite often we know that it will spell more difficulties.”

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Let this be a lesson to all you liberal socialists here in America. This is what happens when you create a system that leads your citizenry to believe that they are entitled to a free life. The French are diametrically opposed to any change that would take away from their lazy way of life.

I mean lets face it. We are talking about a country that almost shuts down every August so these dunskies can go on vacation. The French have created a system in which there is no incentive to perform at work, you can NEVER be fired based on performance and none of that matters because you don’t need to work to live anyway.

The French economy is teetering on the brink of collapse because there are more people taking out of their economy then there are putting in. Yet the french are still indignant and are willing to let the plane crash into the mountain in order to keep their socialist system in tact.

We here in America are heading down the same path to destruction. There are people here in this country that want free medical care, free food, free housing, the list goes on and on. Already the old fossils that collect Social Security have formed numerous coalitions that threaten politicians if social security is cut or simply not raised each year.

This is just the tip of the iceberg for America. The more they give us, the more we want. If you give a man an inch of rope he will want to be a cowboy. Its inherent. If its for free its for me. Thats the way we all think. But no one ever thinks about the cost or how we will come up with the money in the first place.

Let France and Germany be a lesson to America. According to the Wall Street Journal, both of these countries will collapse within the next 15 years unless the government does something to affect change. I will be standing by, laughing like a ten year old boy with two peters when it happens. JD

PARIS, Nov. 15 — Strikers shut down French trains and buses, disrupted electricity production at nuclear plants and barricaded universities Wednesday, giving President Nicolas Sarkozy the toughest challenge yet to his ambitious plans for restructuring the country’s huge social welfare programs.

Commuter traffic backed up along miles of highways leading into Paris during the morning rush hour, while thousands of Parisians took to bicycles, in-line skates, children’s scooters and sneakers to get to work.

Comments that include profanity or personal attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain “signatures” by someone other than the actual author will be removed. Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the content that you post.
The strike continued on Thursday, as transportation workers shut down most rail lines and forced commuters to continue their improvisation. The Associated Press said the government was waiting for union leaders to respond to their offer of company by company negotiations.

But the transit stoppage was just the start of woes for residents, tourists and Sarkozy’s six-month-old government. Technicians at the Paris Opera House and the Comédie Francaise and employees at electric and gas companies also walked off their jobs. Student strikes closed about one-third of the nation’s universities.

In the next several days, civil servants, teachers, postal and telecommunications workers, bank employees and judicial magistrates are scheduled to pile on, to press their own grievances over Sarkozy’s plans or to demand pay raises and better working conditions.

“I will pursue these reforms to the end,” a defiant Sarkozy told the European Parliament as the strikes were launched. “Nothing will blow me off course.”

Sarkozy was elected in part on promises that he would streamline France’s turgid bureaucracy and restructure workplaces to make the country more competitive in the global marketplace. Workers from most of the sectors he is attempting to change are piggybacking on the transit strikes to forestall those changes.

Government employees are trying to retain special pensions, students are resisting proposals to give universities more control over finances and admissions, and magistrates are opposing attempts to consolidate courthouses.

In the face of the second round of public-sector strikes in a month, Sarkozy’s cabinet ministers warned that the disruptions could last for days. “Fasten your seat belts,” advised Prime Minister Francois Fillon. “Millions of French people will be deprived of their fundamental freedom — the freedom of movement and even perhaps to work.”

Newspaper and television opinion polls released Wednesday show dwindling French public support for unions that for decades have shut down services to thwart government efforts to reduce pensions or shrink government institutions.

In a survey conducted for the daily newspaper Le Figaro — which is generally pro-Sarkozy — and television network LCI, nearly seven of every 10 people polled said the strikes were unjustified.

Labor Minister Xavier Bertrand held back-to-back negotiations with labor unions throughout the day in an effort to minimize the length of the strikes.

With most suburban trains idled and only a single automated subway line running on schedule Wednesday, Sarkozy said he was prepared to begin negotiating with unions over modifications to his program, French news media reported late in the day.

But workers for the national rail network and the Paris public transportation system voted Wednesday afternoon to continue the strike into Thursday, with daily votes on continuing the work stoppage in the following days, union officials said.

Many of the unions — including transit workers, electric company employees and opera technicians — were striking to protest Sarkozy’s effort to eliminate a post-World War II benefit that allowed workers in certain hazardous or difficult occupations to retire with full benefits after 37 1/2 years of service, rather than the 40 years required of most workers. Sarkozy has said these special pensions for 500,000 eligible workers and 1.1 million retirees cost taxpayers about $7 billion a year.

Special provisions for Opera House workers date to an edict issued by King Louis XIV in 1698, according to French news reports.

Natalie Levy, wearing a skirt and black high-heeled pumps, attempted to negotiate a crowded rush-hour sidewalk aboard her son’s scooter Wednesday morning. She hit a gaping crack in the concrete, wobbled and snapped a heel.

In no mood to sympathize with the unions or the government, she groused: “The unions are selfish and the government is spineless. How is Sarkozy going to reform the country and make workers more productive when he can’t even get us to our jobs?”

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

The amazing thing about this story is that our elected officials at every level still don’t get it. The people of the United States of America do not want scofflaws rewarded, We want them arrested and deported.

Even in the People’s Republic of New York, one of the most liberal states in America, the people spoke loud and clear when it comes to rewarding law breakers. A loud and resounding “NO” to giving illegal aliens drivers licenses. Yet time and time again our elected officials seem to have a need to pander to these scofflaws, with the hope of getting their anchor baby children’s votes twenty years out.

In an amazing turn of events, ice princess Hillary Rodman Clinton has suddenly decided to be against drivers licenses for illegals. I hope you all take note of her sudden change of heart on this issue. Like her husband Bill, she sticks her finger into the wind and checks to see what direction the wind is blowing and then goes with it.

Thank you New Yorkers for having enough common sense to see that rewarding people that break laws is the wrong thing to do.
Shame on Governor Spitzer for thinking he could get away with ramming this nonsense down our throats. Next year when Governor Spitzer is up for re election I would hope that New Yorkers remember what he did with regard to illegal aliens and throw his sorry ass out of office. JD

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – New York Gov. Eliot Spitzer on Wednesday dropped a plan to issue driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants in his state because of overwhelming opposition to the proposal in an issue with repercussions in the U.S. presidential campaign.

Spitzer’s decision prompted Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton to try to put criticism of her stance on the issue behind her before a Democratic debate on Thursday, shifting her position to being against driver’s licenses for illegal immigrants.
Top Politics stories

“I’ve concluded that New York state cannot conduct this program on its own,” Spitzer, a Democrat, said at a Capitol Hill news conference. “It does not take a stethoscope to hear the pulse of New Yorkers on this topic.”

Spitzer’s plan had sparked a national debate over the extension of certain privileges to illegal immigrants and haunted front-runner Clinton on the campaign trail.

Clinton, a New York senator, initially said the idea made a lot of sense but then equivocated and left her position vague during an October 30 Democratic debate in Philadelphia, prompting her Democratic and Republican rivals to accuse her of engaging in political double-talk.

After Spitzer’s decision, her campaign issued a statement saying she supported his move and made it clear she opposed granting licenses to illegal immigrants.

“As president, I will not support drivers’ licenses for undocumented people and will press for comprehensive immigration reform that deals with all of the issues around illegal immigration including border security and fixing our broken system,” Clinton said.

A rival Democratic candidate, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, quickly ridiculed her move.

“When it takes two weeks and six different positions to answer one question on immigration, it’s easier to understand why the Clinton campaign would rather plant their questions than answer them,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton.

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Norman Mailer and his trophy wife Norman Mailer socialist
I hate to say it, but the United States is a better place without Mr. Mailer. He was a communist and a liar. He said things about America that were baseless and without merit. He was incredibly wealthy, but like Barbra Streisand, he sat on his pallets of money but at the same time wanted the U.S. Government to foot the bill for the poor and the dying. He was a drunkard and a lout. He was also a media darling because like all liberals, he was a toadie for the socialist agenda in America. I would NEVER say a bad word about his obvious talent. He was a wonderful writer and an insightful director as well. But socially he was a mental midget. JD

If Norman Mailer, who died Saturday in a New York hospital of acute renal failure, wasn’t larger than life, he sure gave it a run for its money.

Perhaps the quintessential American author of our era, Mailer, 84, married six times, fathered eight children, stabbed one of his wives during a booze-fueled party, once ran for mayor of New York City, and carried on feuds with other writers with such bloodlust that the whiny dustup between Donald Trump and Rosie O’Donnell seems like a lovers’ tiff.

Scrappy, outspoken and built more like a dock worker than a pen-pusher, Mailer had speech mannerisms that were mesmerizing even if you didn’t always grasp what he was talking about. His tone of voice, which evolved from his birth in New Jersey on Jan. 31, 1923, and childhood in Brooklyn, took on a mid-Atlantic accent – American with posh British undertones. For any other writer, it would have been an odd vocal mix, but it seemed to fit Mailer, reflecting at once his pugnacious, rough-and-tumble public persona, his seemingly insatiable intellectual and cultural curiosity, and his erudition. Oh, and perhaps a bit of self-aggrandizement to boot.

Mailer came from average, middle-class stock. His father, Isaac, was an accountant born in South Africa, while his mother, Fanny, owned a housekeeping and nursing employment agency.

After attending public schools in New York, he went to Harvard to study aeronautical engineering. By the time he earned his degree in 1943, he’d already made up his mind to be a writer, but had to put that idea on hold when he was drafted into the Army and shipped to the Philippines.

In many ways, World War II was the best thing that could have happened to the scrappy Brooklynite: He was getting material firsthand that would later form the basis of his first novel, “The Naked and the Dead,” written after the war while he was studying in Paris on the GI Bill and published in 1948. The book was a huge critical and commercial success, which may seem like a good thing for a beginning writer, but then the question is always put: What’s next? It’s not always easy to come up with the answer, and Mailer flailed around at first, with his second book, “Barbary Shore,” considered pretty much a bust.

For much of his life, Mailer pursued the concept of the great American novel. Or, perhaps it’s better to say it pursued him. The notion seemed to haunt him. Seemingly with each new book, no matter how well reviewed it was, the “big book” remained his version of Gatsby’s green light, something always beyond his reach on a far shore.

With F. Scott Fitzgerald having left the world after collapsing to the floor of a Hollywood bungalow and much of Ernest Hemingway’s best writing behind him, Mailer seemed the logical choice to inherit the mantel of great American author from the Romulus and Remus of 20th century American letters.

Fitzgerald, a “victim” of early success himself, had once said there were no second acts in American lives, and that often seemed to hold true for Mailer. For every great book he published in his six decades as a writer, there were the head-scratchers and groaners, like his highly self-touted novel “Ancient Evenings,” perhaps the biggest failure of his career. But there were also the works that not only further defined Mailer’s singular gift, but also defined us as a nation and a culture.

Mailer gravitated toward the nascent beat culture of the ’50s, writing commentary pieces for the Village Voice, cozying up to writers like Jack Kerouac and Allen Ginsberg, and offering the essay “The White Negro: Superficial Reflections of a Young Hipster,” which looked to African American culture as the foundation for the counterculture in general.

San Francisco author Herbert Gold (“Fathers,” “Haiti: Best Nightmare on Earth”) remembers Mailer from those days.

“I knew him during the time of the late ’50s in New York, when he was writing ‘Advertisements for Myself.’ He was very committed to feuding then,” Gold said. “My great adventure with him at a party at George Plimpton’s place. (Mailer was trying to stare him down.) You know, alpha male makes the other person drop his eyes. He fixed me with a stare, and instead of dropping my eyes, I blew him a kiss. He jumped up, said, ‘Let’s fight.’

“We went outside, and I took my glasses off. It was stupid, but I didn’t know what else to do. So I put them in my pocket. But since no one was watching us, and that’s the key, he put his arm around me and said, ‘You’re OK, Gold.’ ”

Mailer had his share of flops in that era, including “Barbary Shore” (1951) and “The Deer Park,” a novel about the film industry’s reaction to political pressure from Washington.

But as the nation began to creak and groan toward the seismic culture shift of the ’60s, Mailer found his real footing. The social and political upheavals fit Mailer’s style and persona. He never seemed to quite “get” Eisenhower America the way he got what was happening in the Summer of Love, the 1967 anti-Vietnam War march on the Pentagon that became the Pulitzer Prize-winning “The Armies of the Night,” and the Republican and Democratic National Conventions of 1968 that became “Miami and the Siege of Chicago.” The novel “Why Are We in Vietnam?” looked not to the White House or the Pentagon for the reason our young men were dying in a foreign country, but, rather, to our own culture for the answer.

These books, and others, had a major impact on American readers, not just because Mailer wrote them, but because he was becoming a master of the kind of stylistically amalgamated writing practiced by others such as Truman Capote and Tom Wolfe, known as the New Journalism. The style was a good fit for a writer who had touted his own greatness in the 1959 book “Advertisements for Myself.” You didn’t have to make a choice between pure fiction and journalism anymore: You could capture a real-life scene and insert yourself directly into it, rather than gazing from the distance of traditional reportage.

Long before an appearance on “Good Morning America” was deemed crucial to a book’s success, Mailer figured out the cult of personality. He was no doubt as much a press representative’s dream as nightmare. No matter what he did, Mailer always called attention to himself. And if the attention was negative, it never seemed to bother him.

The late critic Anatole Broyard once observed of Mailer, “His career seems to be a brawl between his talent and his exhibitionism.” Those words were written in 1967, but looking back on the full span of Mailer’s career today, one might instead suggest his career was a marriage of talent and exhibitionism.

He carried on epic feuds with writers such as Gore Vidal and Erica Jong. He ran for mayor of New York and came in fifth. He directed several films, including the movie version of his 1984 book “Tough Guys Don’t Dance.” Taking a page from the Hemingway chapbook, he loved bullfighting and boxing, whether in an actual ring or weaving around a party where another guest seemingly insulted him. He stabbed his second wife, Adele Morales, with a pen knife, but was never charged. In her own book 10 years ago, Morales revealed that the cut was severe enough to have endangered her life.

Tom Luddy of Berkeley, the executive producer of “Tough Guys Don’t Dance,” recalled that Mailer “was very natural and warm toward everybody on the film.”

“Of all the films I’ve produced, it’s the one where all of us stayed friends and stayed in touch,” he said. “That rarely happens.”

American life calmed down a bit during the ’70s, but Mailer had learned how to hold the spotlight. Understanding cultural iconography as well as he did, Mailer didn’t hesitate to write the text for the coffee-table book “Marilyn” in 1973. And when the nation erupted in debate over the reinstatement of the death penalty, Mailer wrote a book about Gary Gilmore, the first person executed in the United States in more than a decade. Gilmore was executed by firing squad in 1977, and “The Executioner’s Song” won Mailer another Pulitzer.

After all his marriages, Mailer finally settled down with sixth wife, Norris Church. Coincidentally, Church’s early paintings often seem to replicate family snapshots, complete with the shadow of the photographer in the frame – much like Mailer’s New Journalism style.

His other wives were Beatrice Silverman, Lady Jeanne Campbell, Beverly Bentley and actress Carol Stevens. He had five daughters, three sons and a stepson.

For years, Mailer divided his time between Brooklyn Heights, N.Y., and Provincetown, Mass., where he had a house on the water on Commercial Street.

Although he rarely drew the intensity of attention he enjoyed in the ’60s and ’70s, Mailer was never out of the public eye for long. He continued to publish, right up to the end of his life. His latest novel, “The Castle in the Forest,” gave Mailer a way of examining Adolf Hitler’s early life to understand the nature of evil. Writing in the Chronicle Book Review in January, Alan Cheuse said the book “comes 10 years after the publication of Mailer’s weakest novel, ‘The Gospel According to the Son,’ and it reads like one of his strongest.”

Two years ago, Mailer received a gold medal for lifetime achievement from the National Book Awards.

While he could be mercurial, argumentative, perhaps even insufferable at times, Mailer enjoyed wide respect and affection among other writers.

Said San Francisco author Leo Litwak (“Nobody’s Baby and Other Stories”): “I think his early book ‘Advertisements for Myself’ was enormously influential. It challenged us, in effect, to move outside the law, to give vent to our instincts and desire, to be more public about what we wanted. It was a further move away from the kind of Henry James writing that still had influence.

“It’s an enormous loss,” he added. “I had mixed feelings about Mailer, but I miss him.”

“He had such a compendious vision of what it meant to be alive,” said friend and fellow author William Kennedy. “He had serious opinions on everything there was to have an opinion on, and everything was so original.”

“He could do anything he wanted to do – the movie business, writing, theater, politics,” said author Gay Talese, husband of publisher Nan Talese. “He never thought the boundaries were restricted. He’d go anywhere and try anything. He was a courageous person.”

In a recent interview with John Freeman, president of the National Book Critics Circle, for the Chronicle Book Review, Mailer talked about his early years, when he told the world about that great American novel he would write. He seemed to understand, though, that the time had passed.

“I may have made announcements 50 years ago of the kind of book I was going to write. But I’m not going to stick to those predictions,” he said.

Perhaps, though, he has: As memorable as so many Mailer books will remain, the man himself was perhaps Mailer’s best creation – the great American author.

Chronicle Book Editor Oscar Villalon and Chronicle news services contributed to this report. E-mail David Wiegand at dwiegand@sfchronicle.com.

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

So for all you duncicle idiots, This has nothing to do with “Greenhouse Emissions. ” This has everything to do with controlling our behavior and taxing us into the poor house for using our fireplaces and mowing our yards.

Trust me when I say this. Its just a matter of time before the retards that run the state of California have us all living in poverty and living like the chinese …. Riding bicycles down the freeway.

I can see it now. Being charged a tax for each mile you drive, ( which by the way, this has already been proposed several times) smoke meters on your fireplace to charge you per cubic yard of smoke … the possibilities are endless. This is not just about vehicles. Thats just a diversion tactic. Its about the way we think and live. JD

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov 8 (Reuters) – California sued the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday, demanding a quick federal decision that would allow the nation’s most populous state to limit greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.

“California is ready to implement the nation’s cleanest standards for vehicle emissions, but we cannot do that until the federal government grants a waiver allowing us to enforce those standards,” Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said.

The long-threatened legal action follows a 2005 California law requiring new vehicles to meet tighter standards for emissions, starting with 2009 models introduced next year.

California needs a waiver from the federal government because it is seeking to impose stricter standards than those imposed under federal law. The legal filing asks the court to force a EPA decision on the matter.

If the EPA denies the waiver, “we sue again, and sue again, and sue again until we get it,” Schwarzenegger told reporters.

The federal agency “has unreasonably delayed action on the requested waiver,” according to the lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia.

“Automotive emissions of greenhouse gases are increasing more rapidly than any other source,” the lawsuit said. “The longer the delay in reducing these emissions, the more costly and harmful will be the impact on California.”

EPA spokeswoman Jennifer Wood said her agency plans to make a decision by the end of December.

“We’re less than two months away and clearly California is more interested in getting a good headline than in giving us the time to make a good decision,” she said.

Sixteen other states have either adopted or are considering similar emissions rules, and many joined the lawsuit.

“We are filling the void left by the Bush Administration’s refusal to protect the environment,” New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo said in a statement.

“If the federal government won’t lead on this critical issue, it should get out of the way of states like New York that are moving forward with sensible steps to address the climate crisis.”

U.S. automakers are fighting California’s environmental plans in the courts. In a separate case, a U.S. federal judge threw out a California lawsuit in September that sought to hold vehicle manufacturers responsible for damages caused by climate-changing greenhouse gases.

Last year, California passed a law calling for the most far-reaching greenhouse gas emissions reductions in the United States, saying it would cut global warming gases to 1990 levels by 2020 — or by 25 percent from current levels.

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Duane Dog The Bounty Hunter Chapman racial slur recording calling people the
In a stunning blow to Mullet fans and men that like women with pontoons for breasts, Duane “The Bounty Hunter” Chapman has been canceled from A & E for using racial slurs to describe blacks and hispanics. Here is a link to the National Enquirer where you can here the recording of this inbred motard committing career suicide for yourself. Below is an edited transcript off the conversation …. Enjoy!!!

The ever popular A&E hit series, Dog the Bounty Hunter, has been suspended by A&E due to Duane “Dog” Chapman saying racial slurs to his son’s African American girlfriend. So what happened? Basically, Dog told his son Tucker to dump his girlfriend, Monique Shinnery, and used the n-word six times, which was recorded by Tucker and sold to the National Enquirer who first came out with the story. The reason for telling his son to break up with his girlfriend was because Dog admits that he uses the n-word at their office and that Tucker’s girlfriend might take offense to it if Dog uses the n-word during casual conversation.

Below is a transcript between Dog and his son Tucker (Source: Star Bulletin):

Chapman: Don’t care if she’s a Mexican, a whore, whatever. It’s not ’cause she’s black. It’s because we use the word “n_____” sometimes here. I’m not going to take a chance ever in life by losing everything I’ve worked for for 30 years for some f____ n_____ heard us say “n_____” and turned us in to the Enquirer magazine — our career is over. I’m not taking that chance at all, never in life, never. Never. … If Lyssa was dating a n_____, we would all say f___ you. And you know that. If Lyssa brought a black guy home … It’s not that they’re black. It’s none of that. It’s that we use the word “n____.” We don’t mean “you f___ scum n_____ without a soul.” We don’t mean that s___, but America would think we’re meaning that. And we’re not taking a chance and losing everything we’ve got over a racial slur. Because our son goes with a girl like that, I can’t do that, Tucker, you can’t expect Garry, Bonnie, Cecily, all them young kids … ’cause I’m in love for seven months, I … f___ that. … So I’ll help you get another job, but you cannot work here unless you break up with her and she’s out of your life. I can’t handle that s___. I’ve got ‘em in the parking lot trying to record us. I’ve got that girl saying she’s going to wear a recorder. …

Tucker: I … I … don’t even know what to say.

Hopefully this issue gets resolved. Even though I haven’t met Dog, he seems like a very nice person and I feel as though he did not have any malicious intent when using the n-word. I can’t justify the reason for Dog or anyone else who is not black to use the n-word, but just knowing how Dog is, I say give him some slack. I know I know, he’s a celebrity, so people expect him to only get a slap on the hand. But he has already issued an apology, and has admitted that he should not have used the word, especially in casual conversation.

Let’s hope Dog gets out of this. Dog is a good man doing good deeds. Help him instead of hurting him. He’s gone through enough already.

Post to Twitter

No tags for this post.