Archive for March, 2007

Look at this bleeding heart liberal asshole that has diarrhea of the keyboard. His diatribe goes on and on and NEVER addresses the real issues regarding illegal immigration. What a fucking retard. JD

The Racist War on Immigrants – by Stephen Lendman

Emma Lazarus’ memorable words on Lady Liberty’s pedestal once had meaning as a new nation grew. No longer in a country hostile to the tired, the poor, the huddled masses, the wretched refuse, the homeless and many others not making the grade in a white supremacist Judeo-Christian state worshiping wealth and privilege. No welcome sign is out for the unwanted poor and desperate. At best, they’re ignored to subsist on their own. At worst, they’re scorned and abused, exploited and discarded like trash or labeled “terrorists” in a post-9/11 world of mass witch-hunt roundups aimed at Muslims because of their faith or country of origin and Latinos coming north to survive the fallout from NAFTA’s destructive effects on their lives.

Immigrants of color, the wrong faith or from the wrong parts of the world are never greeted warmly in “America the Beautiful” that’s only for the privileged and no one else. They’re not wanted except to harvest our crops or do the hard, low-pay, no-benefit labor few others will do. The ground rules to come were set straight away in our original Nationalization Act of 1790 establishing the first path to citizenship. It wasn’t friendly to the wrong types as permanent status was limited to foreign-born “free white persons” of “good moral character,” meaning people like most of us – our culture, countries of origin, religion and skin color.

Left out were indentured servants, slaves, free blacks, native Americans being exterminated, and later Asians and Latinos whose “appearance” wasn’t as acceptable as the whiteness of English-speaking European Christian settlers and the mix of others from Western European countries like Holland, Germany and Scandinavia. The law scarcely changed for 162 years until the 1870 15th amendment loosened it enough to include blacks by 1875, no longer slaves but hardly free and in 1940 gave Latin Americans the same right. After the war in 1945 it extended it further to Filipinos and Asian Indians. Original native Americans, whose land this was for thousands of years, only were enfranchised and given the right of citizenship in their own land when Congress passed the Indian Citizenship Act in 1924 after most of them were exterminated in a genocidal process still ongoing, never mentioned in the mainstream, and for which no redress was ever made or likely will be.

The 1952 Immigration and Nationality (McCarran-Walter) Act (INA) only grudgingly did what no law before it allowed. For the first time it made individuals of all races eligible for citizenship but imposed strict quotas for those from the Eastern Hemisphere with different standards for caucasians from the West. But nothing is ever simple and straightforward in “America the Beautiful.” In the early Cold War atmosphere of Joe McCarthy’s communist witch-hunts, anyone accused of leftist sympathies could be targeted, and any alien so-tagged could be deported, and like today no evidence was needed.

From the INA to the present, immigration laws kept changing for better or worse, but one thing was constant. White Christian Western Europeans are welcomed. Others, especially people of color or the wrong religion, get in grudgingly in lesser numbers and receive unequal or harsh treatment when they arrive. The 1996 Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRAIRA) and Anti-Terrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act (AEDPA)proved it showing Democrat presidents can be as mean and nasty as Republicans, especially with help from a Republican-controlled Congress.

The 1996 acts were ugly and repressive ignoring the rights of due process and judicial fairness. They allowed Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) agents to detain legal immigrants without bond, deport them without discretionary relief, restrict their access to counsel, bar them from appealing to the courts, and can be applied for even minor offenses little more than youthful indiscretions. These laws under a Democrat president “feel(ing) our pain” showed no more compassion or equity than later ones under George Bush in force today. They allow no second chances and deny targeted legal immigrants their day in court. Their harshness tears apart families unjustly made to suffer by a nation hardening its stance to the wrong kinds of immigrants. They’re sent an unwelcome message now much worse in the age of George Bush with his permanent wars on the world and homeland “terrorists” meaning anyone called that on his say alone.

It started post-9/11 with the 2001 USA Patriot Act even harsher in its updated Patriot Act II version. Enacted to combat “terrorism,” it’s done on the border with more guards to spot, detain, arrest and incarcerate Latinos entering the country for a way to survive. For being undocumented and on the pretext of being suspected “terrorists,” they may be indefinitely detained or deported the way it works under any despotic national security police state. It’s even worse for Muslims, 5000 of whom were rounded up and held early on with only three of them ever being charged with an offense. And it got far worse for them after that still ongoing.

Today, federal immigration courts can hold secret hearings for anyone here illegally or charged with a law violation, no matter how minor. Those convicted can then be incarcerated or deported to their country of origin often to face arrest and torture. It’s now open season on anyone targeted with legal protection no longer shielding innocent victims Justice Department (DOJ) or Department of Homeland Security (DHS) go after. They includes poor and desperate mostly undocumented Latinos from Mexico and Central America coming el norte because NAFTA, CAFTA and other neoliberal unfair trade agreements called “free” destroyed their ability to earn a living at home leaving them no other choice but come north or perish.

It shouldn’t be that way, and promises were made early on that “free trade” lifted all boats with higher wages and more jobs. Instead millions of jobs were lost while real wages fell under the effects of a globalized market system crafted for investor elites to profit at the expense of ordinary working people paying the price. They’ve been devastated since by a sustained massive wealth transfer to the top of the economic pyramid that in the US alone has been a generational process of well over $1 trillion annually to corporations and the richest 1%.

For the past 13 years, NAFTA and the rest of globalized trade provided cover for imperialism on the march for power and profit. It prospers from economic and shooting wars of conquest with an engineered race to the bottom driven by giant predatory corporations allied with friendly governments in their service at the expense of ordinary working people paying the price. The result – mass and growing poverty, human misery, and ecological destruction great enough to threaten the ability of the planet to sustain life.

Blame it on the globalized market system. It’s the main reason millions around the world are on the move each year as reported by the International Labor Organization. In 2005, the number reached an estimated 200 million fleeing poverty and conflicts, often leaving families behind, heading for developed countries for jobs and safety unavailable at home.

The toll South of the Border alone after 10 years of NAFTA was devastating on Mexico’s poor and getting progressively worse.

– Real wages down 20% and the wealth disparity between rich and poor far greater than in 1994 (NAFTA’s first year).

– Two – three million small farms now gone with Research Director Raul Hinojosa of the North American Integration and Development Center at UCLA predicting 10 million small farmers will eventually be forced off the land, many heading north in desperation.

– Mexico’s banks, railroads, airlines, mines and other industry sold off to foreign investors, mainly US ones with possible plans under the new Calderon government to sell off the country’s crown jewel – Petroleos Mexicanos (PEMEX), the state-owned national oil company up to now kept free from Big Oil predators itching to get their hands on the company and now may have their chance.

– Two million hectares of tropical forest turned over to private developers displacing many thousands of people to make way for “development” and clear-cutting forests.

– Crushed homegrown industries unable to compete against subsidized US giants like behemoth Wal-Mart (Wal-Mex) now the country’s largest private employer and biggest retailer in Latin America.

The Message to Immigrants On Our Southern Border – No Vacancy, or Enter As Indentured Servants with No Rights

Post 9/11, the Homeland Security Act of 2002 was passed establishing the repressive Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and in March, 2003 its largest investigative and enforcement arm – the US Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) charged with protecting the public safety by identifying and targeting “criminal” and “terrorist” threats to the country, most of whom, in fact, are just desperate people whose NAFTA-ruined lives at home force them el norte to survive.

ICE was established to head them off at the border or hunt them down ruthlessly once here. It’s comprised of four integrated divisions with responsibilities over the nation’s infrastructure, economic security, transportation system and the subject of this essay – policing our southern border with Mexico going after people the color of the earth victims suffering for what we did to them by our made-in-Washington trade and other unfair economic policies. So the gloves are off, anything goes, and ICE is free to rampage with its large share of DHS’s total budget now up to $43 billion, heading for $46.5 in the president’s submitted FY 2008 budget.

On the Homeland Security web site, ICE openly boasts about what it should be condemned for. At FY-end 2006 on October 30, it listed what it called “historic results (and) new records for enforcement activity” including:

– Total work site arrests sevenfold greater than in FY 2002.

– Ended the former practice of “catch and release” ICE called “the greatest impediment to border control.” It substituted the harsher practice of catch and incarcerate or catch and deport – or hound, threaten, catch, brutalize, incarcerate, then deport victimized people who’ll try again to survive.

– Removed a record high number of 186,000 “illegal aliens” and increased its detention bed space by 6300 to a FY-end total of 27,500 with an average daily number of incarcerated or detained immigrants up to 26,000 since July and rising.

– Increased the number of “fugitive operations teams” nationwide from 18 to 50 charged with locating, apprehending and removing “criminal aliens” meaning alien victims called criminals. Through its Operation Return to Sender, ICE arrested 14,356 aliens and deported 4716 of them from May 26 to September 30, 2006. ICE intends having 75 teams operating by end of FY 2007 to up the numbers considerably which they’ll do.

– Created a national center operating at all ICE detention facilities to deport “criminal aliens” when released from incarceration. Most will be back.

– Completed a record high number of “arms and strategic technology” investigations by doubling the number of personnel assigned to do them and by implementing new electronic data entry procedures to track immigration “violators” and “fugitives.”

– Claimed it dismantled the large Colombia Cali drug cartel to stem illegal narcotics trafficking while failing to acknowledge other US agencies, most notably CIA, have a long sordid history of drugs trafficking worldwide as an important revenue source with CIA now partnered with Northern Alliance warlords in Afghanistan (among others around the world) having turned the country into a narco-state, according to a UN report, supplying 92% of the world’s opium used for heroin.

– Conducted financial investigations of human smuggling and other immigration related cases resulting in asset seizures of $42 million or double the amount gotten in FY 2004.

– Through its Operation Community Shield arrested 3700 since February, 2005 including 2290 suspected “gang members.”

– From worksites, arrested 716 workers (and a few employers getting mere wrist slaps) on “criminal” charges and 3667 individuals on “administrative” charges – a sevenfold increase in total arrests from FY 2002.

– Worked with Department of Justice (DOJ) in document and immigration benefits fraud cases resulting in 235 investigations, 189 arrests and 80 convictions.

– Expanded its partnership with state and local authorities training 40 state and county law enforcement officers as part of the 287(g) program of immigration enforcement with additional partnerships to come.

ICE listed a disturbing array of other FY-end 2006 “achievements” involving enhanced intelligence gathering and analysis; targeting “national security threats;” detecting, tracking and arresting visa violators; “enhancing border security;” targeting transnational gangs, human smugglers and sexual predators; targeting money launderers and others committing financial crimes while granting de facto immunity to large US banks, including major international money center ones, known to launder drug money as one of their major profit centers; and much more.

DHS/ICE Billions for the Border

With a budget increased by 50% over five years ago, DHS/ICE has billions to use guarding our borders from “dangerous” poor people. Ignored is that those working here pay billions more in federal, state and local taxes for performing services (in jobs others don’t want) than they get back in meager benefits like sub-standard education for their children in inner city or other public schools and inadequate health care when they’re sick.

Still they come from need, not choice in a risky, dangerous journey starting with what it costs for help getting here. It’s plenty extorted by Coyote smugglers and other predatory intermediaries treating them like pollos (chickens) once on their way north. They get crammed in trucks and cars, travel after dark, and aren’t prepared for the hazards they’ll face including 115 degree or higher summer temperatures crossing an unforgiving desert that end up killing hundreds each year from exposure who when found are just anonymous John Does leaving families behind never knowing what happened or what to do next.

And handling those risks depends on getting past heavy DHS/ICE border security in place post-9/11. They’re ready and waiting with video cameras, state of the art motion sensors, infrared goggles, other security electronics and helicopters with forward-looking infrared (FLIR) scopes plus an unforgiving thuggish army of 6000 or more National Guard troops as part of Operation Jumpstart. They supplement the Border Patrol agent staff of 12,349 heading for 17,819 proposed for FY 2008, double the number it had in FY 2001.

Add to this army an extremist well-funded volunteer force in place called the Minutemen Civil Defense Corps (MCDC) or “Minutemen” for short. Their name comes from those “ready in a minute men” dating back to the mid-1600s when volunteers were trained to be first on the scene to defend their communities in case of conflict. Today’s Minutemen on our southern border are for offense, not defense. All they defend is white supremacy and racial hatred against poor, desperate people unable to survive at home. Left no other choice, they come north, but doing it pits them against these ultra-hard right volunteer paramilitary thugs licensed to kill. They man the southern border by the thousands hunting down and terrorizing anyone caught entering the country without visas.

They’re supported by other anti-immigrant hate groups and organizations like the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR, not to be confused with the noted media watch group using the same acronym standing for Fairness & Accuracy in Reporting). The racist FAIR is lobbying Congress for repressive immigration legislation that will deny Latinos and others coming here basic civil and human rights by stepping up harsh border security, increasing Gestapo-like crackdowns against those already here, and giving predatory corporations the right to exploit the ones allowed in or manage to come anyway. The fate of millions of honest, hard-working immigrant families depends on exposing and stopping the kind of work these groups do and what they stand for.

In spite of them and all the other hazards they face, and word gets back about them, the courageous poor keep coming for a better life to support their families usually left behind desperate for whatever aid their loved ones can send back. No amount of manpower, security and technology in place can stop them. Those caught and sent back try again, eventually circumventing the obstacles against them on a near-2000 mile long border, all of which can’t be patrolled. But that takes them into the harshest stretches of desert many each year never leave. And still they come, risking everything, tens of thousands each year, their numbers growing as NAFTA and neoliberal market-imposed rules leave them no choice – head north or perish.

Congressional Reform or Deform in 2007

Things could change if trade was fair, not unfair, under made-in-Washington one-way “free trade” rules legalizing unfairness, especially in areas like agriculture so crucial to millions of small farmers in developing countries like Mexico forced off the land unable to compete against heavily subsidized US agribusiness. But carrots aren’t on the legislative docket in Congress, only assorted sticks in the stalled compromise immigration bill providing no relief the way things are progressing so far in both Houses.

So-called “immigration reform” stalled last year after the House passed the repressive HR 4437 Sensenbrenner bill, The Border Protection, Anti-Terrorism, and Illegal Immigration Act of 2005, in December, 2005. It was a law only racists and hatemongers could love. It galled, or embarrassed, enough senators to clean it up some and pass S 2611, the Comprehensive Immigration Reform Act or Hagel-Martinez bill last May. It was still bad enough to create a permanent underclass of low-paid workers, allow employers the right to exploit them, place restraints on wages and benefits, and create a nightmarish multi-tiered bureaucratic structure for temporary partial legalization leaving out of the mix millions of undocumented workers already here and delaying citizenship for those eligible for almost two decades.

Workers, most unions and others for immigrant rights oppose this bill, but shamefully it’s supported by the Service Employees International Union (SEIU) and UNITE HERE representing hotel, food service, apparel, textile and gaming industries with both unions sacrificing their members’ rights for whatever the leadership gets from collaborating with employers and Washington.

Proposed Immigration Legislation Includes A New Bracero Program

New immigration legislation proposed in Congress leaves in it most of the harsh measures in S 2611 including a new temporary or guest worker plan with shades of the infamous Bracero Program in force from 1942 – 1964. It created a system of indentured servitude ongoing to this day, even after its official end, with an army of serfs with no rights giving employers the legal right to exploit over 4.6 million Mexican migrant farm workers. They were denied basic rights; got only temporary, low-wage jobs; often were cheated out of pay earned; held in virtual captivity by employers seizing their documents; denied the right to change jobs freely; forced to live in squalid conditions; denied medical care or benefits for injuries received; forced to endure severe harassment and oppression from employers knowing they could ship braceros home whenever they complained too much about what they had plenty to complain about. It happened in 1954 when a recession triggered a political backlash against Mexican communities resulting in the deportation or flight of over one million Mexican migrant workers and their families under Operation Wetback including children born here as US citizens.

Today, 120,000 foreign guest workers receive temporary H-2 visas established under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 for farm and other low-skilled work (H-2A for farm and H-2B for the rest), usually for three to nine months, under conditions similar to the former Bracero Program under which they were mistreated and cheated on entry, while here and on the way out in a cycle of abuse sure to be repeated if a George Bush-style guest worker program becomes law. Even professional workers are harmed under the H-1B program assuring they, like non-professionals, are marginalized and mistreated under a system where employers control everything, and workers are just indentured servants with no choice but to take it or leave it and go home.

Immigrant rights groups oppose the legislation, and the National Alliance for Immigrants’ Rights wants full legalization for all immigrant workers in the country and a halt to all raids and deportations – provisions not in the compromise bill and unlikely to be added. Fear of arrest haunts the undocumented at a time when terrorism in the news trumps immigrant worker rights, especially Latinos (and Muslims) getting none.

That came out in a scathing Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) report based on thousands of guest worker interviews and dozens of legal cases documenting appalling abuses of vulnerable immigrants unable to get redress. SPLC’s Immigrant Justice Project director, Mary Bauer, said: “Guest workers are usually poor people who are lured here by the promise of decent jobs. But all too often, their dreams are based on lies, their hopes shattered by the reality of a system that treats them as commodities. They’re the disposable workers of the global economy.” SPLC president Richard Cohen added: “The mistreatment of temporary workers in America today is one of the major civil rights issues of our time.”

New Senate and House immigration bills will soon be debated including bipartisan legislation unveiled March 22 in the House by Latino Democrat Luis Gutierrez and Republican Jeff Flake. Sadly, it’s little more than the usual “same old, same old.” In this case, it’s largely a rehash of last year’s stalled S 2611 bill that rightfully is sure to mobilize immigrants’ rights groups against it. It proposes a repressive guest worker bracero program with provisions allowing those qualified to get three year visas renewable for another three years after which workers would be forced to go home. To be eligible, immigrants would have to learn English, pass criminal and security checks and pay back taxes ignoring the fact that most all undocumented workers already pay taxes, give far more than they get back, and are honest hard-working people.

To get a green card then and be eligible for future legal residency (only for those arriving before June 1, 2006), they’d then have to go home (under the so-called “touch back” provision) and start again. They’d also have to pay a $2000 fine and prove to authorities they’re model material enough to qualify to stay here. More than half the bill is even more repressive. It contains harsh provisions for stepped up DHS/ICE (paramilitary) border security above what’s now in place with more manpower and a multi-billion dollar high-tech border surveillance “shield” now under construction. Other provisions include a mandated biometric system employers must use to verify workers have legal status while overall this bill, like the others from both Houses, contains a corporate wish list at the expense of undocumented Latino immigrants it wishes to exploit. In short, it’s appalling and will surely be opposed on the streets en masse around the country in the spring and summer.

This proposal and others will be on the docket in both Houses for debate in coming weeks with final resolution planned for late spring or summer unless protest opposition delays it again or defeats it. Neither House version improves much over what stalled legislatively last year, and only mass civil rights protests like the historic ones in dozens of cities last spring have a chance to do it or find a way for real immigration reform benefitting people, not the special interests exploiting them with help from Congress and the administration.

Support for continued exploitation is driving the political process, even from unexpected places showing how long the odds are for legislative justice. It’s coming from the National Council of La Raza, “the largest Latino civil rights and advocacy organization in the United States (working) to improve opportunities for Hispanic Americans.” NCLR reaches millions of Hispanics in and outside the country. It was founded in 1968 by noted labor organizer, community leader and author Ernesto Galarza who wrote about braceros being “indentured aliens” and prototypical “production (men) of the future” stripped of all political and social rights in what he called an “input factor” to suck worth from and discard. He and labor leaders like Cesar Chavez and others all campaigned to end the program.

His organization today, under President Janet Murguia, is now an apologist for corporate America lobbying for braceros at home like the ones they exploit around the world in a global race to the bottom affecting working people everywhere. In a February 11 Washington Post op-ed piece, she wrote her “organization and many (unidentified) Latino leaders (support) a significant new worker visa program as part of comprehensive immigration reform.” Incredibly, Ms. Murguia denounced the original bracero program for its abuses while advocating a new version of the same thing now. It’s no surprise because NCLR also supported NAFTA before it passed opposing US and Mexican labor and community-based organizations against it at the time for all the damage it would do now apparent.

The new guest worker program NCLR supports, in proposed House and Senate legislation, will embrace all the faults of its bracero predecessor. It will create a large desperate, defenseless immigrant workforce vulnerable here to the same kinds of abusive exploitive practices corporate giants inflict on their overseas workers – denying their right to organize, receive fair wages and benefits or be guaranteed basic civil and human rights everyone should have by law. These rights can only come through legislation guaranteeing all immigrants permanent legal residency, a fairly defined path to citizenship, and provisions for family members to immigrate so they all can be together.

Immigrant and other civil rights groups also need to lobby and protest for repeal of the 2006 Deficit Reduction Act denying immigrants the right to receive Medicaid that’s also harming tens of thousands of poor US citizens having trouble complying with new requirements. They include showing passports or a combination of an original or certified copy of a birth certificate and driver’s license proving their legal status in the country. This is another example of the Bush administration’s racist war on Latinos and the poor with Congress going along in a long-term bipartisan effort to roll back the country’s social safety net till nothing in it remains. It’s time human, civil rights and other progressive organizations of all stripes mounted a combined effort to fight back, no longer being willing to see the social state destroyed in service to wealth and privilege at the expense of society’s most vulnerable that includes the immigrant population giving America back much more than it receives and now getting even less.

They may also have to take on another potential opponent – the nation’s oldest and best known environmental group, the Sierra Club founded in 1892 by noted naturalist writer and wilderness preservationist John Muir, that’s up to now been neutral on immigration but no longer. It’s leadership split on the issue with one side called Support US Population Stabilization (SUSPS) focusing on population control that includes restricting immigration to preserve the environment. So far, there’s no resolution and internal debate continues, but it needs watching as it’s a slippery slope from advocating responsible world population growth to one focusing on US immigration that always means those of color, the most vulnerable, and mainly desperate and impoverished Latinos forced here by made-in-the-US predatory trade and other neoliberal policies leaving them no other choice. That should be the Sierra Club’s target, not the innocent victims of bad policies coming here to survive them.

In the Meantime – Terror Raids in the Workplace Continue

Workplace assaults targeting immigrants continue as part of a generational war on labor including the right of workers to organize and bargain on equal terms with management. They’re also part of the Bush administration’s campaign for a government-controlled (exploitative) new bracero guest worker program explained by DHS secretary Michael Chertoff’s message (through the media) to Congress for the need for “stronger border security, effective interior enforcement and a temporary-worker program (because) businesses (needing) foreign workers….can’t otherwise satisfy their labor needs (so government must help out with) a ‘regulated’ program.” He also told reporters in Mexico City February 16….”total immigration reform (addressing) migrants is actually an enforcement enabler because it lets us focus more on the people that we don’t want….criminals and dangerous folks” – racist code language aimed at Latinos. It’s meant to sanction DHS/ICE detentions and deportations and allow employers the right to abuse and fire Latino workers on any pretext as part of an endgame strategy, Operation Wetback-style.

The plan is a shocker. It’s to mass-remove an estimated 12 million undocumented immigrants by 2012 while allowing others under captive contacts to stay as exploitable guest workers. This was what immigration reform legislation was all about in 2006 to be repeated when debate begins again in both Houses and a final bill emerges showing both parties support corporate interests and will affirm their right to exploit all working people, starting with guest workers. Part of it includes Chertoff and ICE assistant sectretary Julie Myers unleashing a paramilitary-style reign of terror against so-called illegals or undocumented immigrants in the workplace aimed at easy-to-target Latinos. Both parties want to assure businesses have a large exploitable documented temporary worker pool they can use as needed, abuse as they wish, underpay, deny benefits and above all use as a wedge to destroy organized labor and the rights of all working people in the country.

This is what the racist war on immigrants is all about. It’s to empower employers by creating a workplace of unempowered serfs including US citizens with few or no rights or job security at the mercy of business to hire and fire at will and treat their employees as they wish written into the law of the land. It’s to create a “bracero America,” corporate America’s wet dream.

The Bush administration is using high-profile workplace assaults as a sinister strategy to get it. Complicit with them are the corporate media trumpeting the message that desperate Latinos here for jobs to replace ones NAFTA destroyed are threats to national security. It happened last December 12 in the largest ever workplace raid when ICE storm troops swooped in on Colorado-based Swift & Company targeting six of its plants. Agents rounded up 1282 allegedly undocumented immigrant workers, including 170 accused of identity theft, detained them at the plants, then bussed them across state lines to be processed with most later released far from home. The raids were vicious and racist as are all others around the country targeting immigrants of color. The Hispanic National Bar Association reported December 18 “non-Latinos and light-skinned employees were provided blue wristbands which exempted them from questioning, while Latinos, persons perceived to be of Hispanic or Latino origin, underwent immigration processing (the notion being that) all persons perceived to be Latinos are illegal.”

Most immigrant workers at Swift and around the country are impoverished-by-NAFTA Mexicans or other Latinos driven North for jobs in desperation resulting from the Global North’s failed neoliberal agenda. They’re helpless victims of savage capitalism forced to leave home, exploited in the workplace, and terrorized by Homeland Security ICE storm troop enforcers earning their keep at the expense of ordinary working people targeted as criminals because they’re less white than other workers passed over in the raids.

But that’s not how DHS and corporate media trumpeting characterized the victims. ICE and its media mouthpiece claimed the raids were a major victory in the war on illegal immigrants, and by implication the so-called “war on terror” (against innocent people they call “terrorists).” The United Food and Commercial Workers International Union (UFCW) representing Swift workers scoffed at the claims as outrageous denouncing them saying they’re “not an effective form of immigration reform (and) They terrorize workers and destroy families.” ICE also trumpeted a (hollow) victory against criminal elements supplying phony IDs that could also be used by “terrorists” or as part of an identity theft scheme victimizing many thousands of US citizens and lawful residents.

It was subterfuge and part of the current political climate with headline-making theatrics more important than defending the homeland against legitimate threats. It showed in the aftermath of this hugely expensive ICE operation amounting to little more than a PR stunt providing red meat for hard liners wanting their kind of immigration reform meaning no rights for workers, especially ones of color. The raid ended up netting 65 “criminal arrests,” many for minor offenses like reentering the country after being deported, a technical violation rarely resulting in prosecution. The others were shipped around the country and likely released except for those voluntarily agreeing to be deported.

The December Swift raid was the largest ever, but immigrant workers everywhere have reason to fear the same threat that was repeated against meatpackers from Smithfield Foods’ processing plant in Tar Heel, North Carolina, the largest hog processing plant in the country. Most of its workers are African-American and Latino, and hundreds of them defied plant management’s refusal to give them the day off by rallying in nearby Fayetteville honoring Martin Luther King Day January 15.

Retaliation came January 24, when ICE agents raided the plant arresting 21 immigrant meatpackers on trumped up “administrative immigration charges” meaning they were poor Latinos vulnerable to ICE assaults made to send a message. DHS supports management rights, not those of working people. The Tar Heel plant’s 5000 workers have been trying to organize within the United Food and Commercial Workers (UFCW) since the early 1990s, but are opposed by management and its policy of retaliatory firings, intimidation, and beatings by plant security. Smithfield like other corporate giants plays hardball. So doesn’t ICE acting like Gestapo ruthlessly assaulting working people with special viciousness reserved for vulnerable Latinos (and Muslims) having no defense.

Still another ICE assault the AP called “the largest immigration bust in the history of southern Massachusetts” happened March 6 against Michael Bianco, Inc. in New Bedford, MA, a manufacturer of high-end leather goods now producing safety vests and backpacks for the military. In this case, conditions for workers were deplorable, according to US Attorney Michael Sullivan, who called them similar to the sweatshops of the early 1900s. He arrested and charged the owner, three managers and another employee but freed them pending a court date for hiring undocumented immigrants. It’s likely outcome will be the way it usually is for corporate offenders – a small wrist slap fine….case dismissed.

Hundreds of workers weren’t so fortunate with as many as 350 of them apprehended and initially detained at Fort Devens for processing. From there, some were jailed in Massachusetts and Rhode Island, others released, and most were flown to jails in Texas and a few to Miami, far from their families and facing deportation or incarceration for those unable to prove they’re in the country legally. Most are poor Latino women from Central America. In the meantime, as in other raids, parents and children are separated and traumatized, their lives disrupted with an estimated 100 children in this instance, including nursing infants, left stranded with babysitters and caregivers. Many will end up at the mercy of strangers in foster care, uncertain of their parents’ fate only here to earn enough to support them. Left unmentioned is that those born here are US citizens entitled to the constitutional rights they’ll never get because they’re less-than-white poor Latinos.

One other example deserves mentioning as well as it’s now in the news. This one is in Pascagoula, Mississippi where hundreds of guest workers from India are protesting job conditions at Signal International’s Gulf coast shipyard they compare to slavery. Signal brought in about 300 Indian workers in December and another 300 to work in Texas as part of the H-2B visa program. Workers got promises of pay and working conditions Signal reneged on plus workers having to pay recruiting contractor Global Industry (sent by Signal to India) up to $20,000 to come. They were promised $18 an hour for up to 30 months work but most only got half that amount. They also had to pay Signal $35 a day to stay in company labor camp barracks inside the yard where workers described conditions as “very bad (with) 24 of us….in a room in a barracks that measures 12 feet by 18 feet, sleeping on bunk beds (with) two toilets for all of us and only 4 sinks.”

Workers began meeting at a local church to discuss how to get Signal to refund their contractor fee, which they said the company promised to do, and to protest their working conditions. They organized a group called Signal H-2B Workers United. When the company learned of it, it responded harshly calling the workers unqualified and cutting their already lower than promised pay. In addition, eight were declared completely incapable and told they were being sent home immediately. Outside the yard, dozens of workers and community supporters protested denouncing the firings and mistreatment. So far, nothing is resolved, but the Mississippi Immigrant Rights Alliance and Southern Poverty Law Center are going to court on behalf of the fired workers to stop their deportations. Other workers still employed are continuing their actions challenging Signal to refund their contractor-paid money they’re entitled to receive with that issue possibly heading for court as well.

Plants like Signal’s involved Indian workers and wasn’t raided because workers in it were legally recruited by the company. Others, however, employing Latino immigrants, are savagely assaulted, and so are communities with programs for day laborers like the Coalition for Humane Immigrant Rights of Los Angeles targeted in January by ICE sweeps in Southern California Latino neighborhoods. Coalition leader Antonio Bernabe told Reuters “The police didn’t just take people with deportation orders, they took anybody–guys who were just hanging out in the street and even from a Jack in the Box restaurant….and now people are afraid to go out.” The sweep aimed mainly at Latinos, mostly Mexican nationals, sent a message following George Bush’s State of the Union address calling for “comprehensive immigration reform” combining a (mean-spirited) guest worker (bracero) worker program with tougher workplace and border enforcement meaning it’s open season on Latinos and working people overall.

Immigrant Communities and Supportive Organizations Respond

Immigrant communities and organizations are fighting back against ICE rampaging terror raids and are rallying their members and supporters to take a stand. The Immigrant Solidarity Network is promoting May Day 2007 and a National Mobilization to Support Immigrant Workers Rights calling for a “national day of multi-ethnic unity with youth, labor, (and) peace and justice communities with immigrant workers and building (a)new immigrant rights & civil rights movement.”

Proudly and boldly they proclaim “We are all human! No one is illegal! It’s call to action stands for:

– No anti-immigration legislation or criminalization of immigrant communities.

– No militarization of the border with fences or other barriers.

– No more immigration detentions, deportations or funding for immigrant detention centers.

– No oppressive guest worker two-tiered program allowing employers the right to pay visa workers lower wages, provide no labor protections, and offer little or no right to future US citizenship.

– No employer “no-match” Social Security letters to fire immigrants and repeal of employer sanction law.

– Yes to a clear, fair one-tiered path for undocumented workers to gain legal status and an opportunity for citizenship.

– Yes to family reunifications through additional visa numbers and elimination of long family reunification backlog delays.

– Yes to strengthening existing labor law protection to include all immigrant workers including their human and civil rights.

– Yes to the right to organize and bargain collectively on equal terms with management.

– Yes to the Dream Act with provisions for states to aid immigrants with benefits like providing in-state tuition aid and enable students of good moral character to qualify for legal residency.

– Yes to extending benefits to LGBT immigrant families, passing the Uniting American Families Act for same sex and unmarried partners, and lifting the HIV ban on immigration.

Other organizations as well are working for immigrant rights. They include:

– The Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund (MALDEF). It calls itself the most influential Hispanic advocacy group in the country standing for open-borders and for all legal and undocumented immigrants to be entitled to the same rights as US citizens.

– The Puerto Rican Legal Defense and Education Fund (PRLDEF). It calls itself the most important organization for day laborer rights in the Northeast standing for real immigration reform so that millions of the undocumented have a clear path for legalization and citizenship.

– The National Network for Immigrant and Refugee Rights (NNIRR). It’s a broad-based organization advocating for immigrants, refugees, community, religious, civil rights, labor and activists. It promotes a just immigration and refugee policy defending and expanding the rights of legal and undocumented immigrants and refugees.

– The American Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee (ADC). It advocates for people of Arabic origin harshly treated post 9/11 and was a co-plaintiff challenging Section 215 of the Patriot Act allowing for government access to medical, educational and library records relating to “terrorism” investigations or others claimed for national security. At least two ADC chapters publicly condemned immigrant apprehensions, detentions, disappearances, the denial of legal representation, and “secret military (or other) tribunals calling these actions chilling “similarities to a police state.”

– The Muslim Legal Fund of America (MLFA). It calls itself the most effective legal fund in the country committed to preserving, safeguarding and promoting the civil and legal rights of American-Islamic institutions and Muslim Americans.

– The Coalition for the Human Rights of Immigrants (CHRI) formed in response to increased workplace raids by the INS, now DHS/ICE. It advocates for undocumented immigrants’ labor rights (mainly Mexicans) confronting “anti-immigrant policies through grassroots education and action.”

– The Immigrant Legal Resource Center (ILRC) – an organization involved in training more than 800 nonprofit personnel and attorneys in areas of immigration law including naturalization, deportation defense, ethics, and Delayed Enforced Departure. It condemns the harsh practices now employed against immigrant communities and in the workplace as unconstitutional.

Street Protest Actions with More Planned

Protests for immigrants’ rights are beginning in cities around the country like the week of them in the San Francisco Bay Area from February 26 through March 2. Throughout the week, community leaders, people of faith, labor leaders, teachers and youths rallied against ICE raids and guest worker programs speaking out for “yes to legalization for all (undocumented workers).”

Similar actions are planned elsewhere including in Chicago by a group called the March 10 Movement named after the 500,000-strong largest ever protest in the city held on that date in 2006. They’ll include rallies for passage of real immigration reform including a path to legalization for all undocumented workers and an end to detentions and deportations. The first of the planned marches was held on March 10 – of course – in the city’s downtown area to be repeated each week “until there is a real solution” from Congress, signed into law. If they follow through, it will mean a long spring and summer of protest marches.

Last year’s mass Chicago march inspired millions of immigrants and supporters to rally in cities around the country that helped defeat the worst parts of anti-immigration legislation mostly crafted in the racist House Sensenbrenner bill now a dead letter. Since then, however, no progress for reform has been made and pending action from the compromise House-Senate bill and most recent new House proposal will continue an ongoing war on immigrants only mass opposition street protests have a chance to stop the way last year’s actions achieved modest success now stalled and slipping.

That’s how things are now in a nation dedicated to permanent war, a bipartisan criminal class in Washington beholden to capital, and workers everywhere losing out in a race to the bottom. Poor Latinos (and all Muslims) face some of the worst of it, and those in Mexico and Central America face a Hobson’s choice. Wither at home under NAFTA and CAFTA or try making it north to suffer abuse and neglect in an uncaring state dedicated to keeping its tired and poor and huddled masses permanently that way. That’s the message from Congress in the kind of “immigration reform” being crafted, but Latinos and others on the streets have other ideas.

At over 45 million strong, Latinos are now the largest ethnic group in the country and fastest growing with its Mexican component rising fastest of all. Nowhere is this more apparent than in California where about one-third of all Latinos live and make up over one-third of the state’s population of 36 million. It’s even more pronounced in Los Angeles where Latinos are now a majority providing a future glimpse of America with this group becoming more dominant than ever but still marginalized, demeaned and denied real equity and justice in a country clinging to its Christian white supremacist roots.

That can only change with mass civil disobedience street protests, employer boycotts and a campaign targeting Congress for justice long delayed and denied and now demanded in the current legislative session. Real change never comes from the top down. It’s always from the bottom up that’s unstoppable when enough people mobilize in the streets and halls of power for it.

That’s where things now are entering spring that promises months of rallies and protests around the country. With enough of them, Congress might start hearing the Immigrant Solidarity Network’s message that “We are all humans (and) no one is illegal,” and the one from the Mexican American Political Association that Mexican and Hispanic people want and deserve the same constitutional and democratic freedoms all others in America are entitled to. That’s what they say and want. Now they’re coming out again demanding it. Stay tuned.

Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Get a load of this story. This company was actually using illegal aliens to build the new fence that runs between California and mexico that is intended to keep illegal aliens out! How stupid would you sound if you called your relatives down in mexico and told them that your new job was to help build a fence to keep the rest of your family out? What irony. JD

SAN DIEGO: Two executives at a company that once helped build a fence to keep illegal immigrants from crossing the Mexican border were sentenced to six months of home confinement for hiring undocumented workers.

Mel Kay, founder, chairman and president of Golden State Fence Co., and manager Michael McLaughlin had pleaded guilty in federal court to knowingly hiring illegal aliens. U.S. District Judge Barry Ted Moskowitz on Wednesday ordered each to serve 1,040 hours of community service and spend three years on probation.

Kay, 64, was fined $200,000 (€150,000) as part of a plea agreement, and McLaughlin, 42, agreed to pay $100,000 (€75,000).

Federal prosecutors took the rare step of seeking prison time after the men acknowledged hiring at least 10 illegal immigrants in 2004 and 2005. The charges carried a maximum possible penalty of five years in prison.

However, prosecutors were unable to find a previous case in which an employer had been sent to jail for knowingly hiring illegal immigrants.
Today in Americas
Bush warns he will veto any Iraq war deadline
News analysis: United on Iraq, Democrats seek broader foreign policy vision
U.S. Navy flexes its muscles in the Gulf

“Prosecution is long overdue in this area,” Moskowitz said. “Honestly, the government’s efforts have been at the border, not with the employer. Obviously, the government has signaled a change with this case.”

In December, company officials acknowledged knowingly hiring illegal immigrants and agreed the firm would pay a $4.7 million (€3.52 million) fine, one of the largest for immigration violations.

Moskowitz said he was uneasy with handing down jail time because the company did not deserve to be “the poster child” for unscrupulous employers. All of Kay’s workers paid Social Security taxes and received health benefits, vacation and sick time. Many earned more than $50,000 (€37,460) a year.

Golden State saw sales soar from $60 million in 1998 to $150 million in 2004, according to a biography of Kay provided by the company.

Federal authorities said they found no evidence that illegal immigrants were hired in the late 1990s while the company built more than a mile (1.6 kilometers) of the 14-mile (22.5-kilometer) fence near a border crossing in San Diego.

Government agents raided Golden State Fence’s Riverside office last year and found that more than 100 people were unauthorized to work — including three the company had been ordered not to employ after a 1999 audit by the government.

Kay apologized before he was sentenced and described how his business suffered after the guilty pleas. Golden State was banned from government work, which accounts for 30 percent of its revenue. The company has laid off about 150 employees, leaving it with about 500 workers.

“I feel I have paid a tremendous price,” Kay said. “I’ve lost a lot of accounts. (Customers) don’t want to be guilty by association.”

McLaughlin said he was relieved at not having to serve prison time.

The company did work at military bases and other government facilities — an irony that Moskowitz noted as he considered whether to send Kay to prison.

“He’d probably go to one of the camp facilities that he built the fence for,” the judge said.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Illegal workers and employers could face a new hurdle. A proposed ballot measure would make it a crime to be an illegal immigrant in Arizona.

Employers who hire illegal workers would lose their business licenses.

This contractor said something needs to be done.

“We’ve allowed it to happen and we need to change it,” he said. “It is illegal and they shouldn’t be here.”

Don Goldwater, a 2006 candidate for governor, had this to say.

“If we get these initiatives passed it will take pressure off the hospitals. It’s going to take pressure off our educational system,” Goldwater said. “It will help reduce crime, and it will help reduce our neighborhoods to something we can call safe once again.”

One measure also aims to end so-called sanctuary policies, which prohibit police from asking the immigration status of those they contact.

In general, police have said enforcing immigration law will make it harder to maintain trust in immigrant communities. Fewer migrants would cooperate for fear of being deported.

Eric Edwards of the Police Chiefs Association says it’s also a resource issue.

“If we’re to address the most violent criminals, the ones who are preying on our communities, chiefs need the ability to determine the appropriate use of those resources,” Edwards said.

And Edwards said the constitution prohibits local police from enforcing most immigration laws, despite what initiative backers claim.

Immigrant rights advocates spoke out against the proposed measures.

“For all those who say we should punish the employer for hiring undocumented, I say you should be careful what you wish for,” said Lidia Guzman from “We Are America.”

She said the ballot proposals targeting employers could hurt all of us.

“Employers faced with stiff sanctions may just pick up their business and take it elsewhere and that’s going to hurt the economy of this state,” Guzman said.

She said the measure targeting companies who hire illegal immigrants doesn’t have strong support.

“The employers are not behind it and it affects the legislators who in the past have been very conservative,” Guzman said.

She believes the measure targeting illegal immigrants is unnecessary.

“It’s already on the books that to be here undocumented that you will be punished,” Guzman said. “They will ask for your deportation and they will deport you.”

She thinks immigration legislation should come from the top.

“The national level is where immigration should be addressed, not at the local level,” Guzman said.

The measure still needs thousands of signatures before it can make the 2008 ballot.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Listen, There was nothing “accidental” about Anna Nicole Smith’s overdose. I’m not going to go into what I think about conspiracy theories here. I just think the bitch was that stupid. Let’s face it, When Anna was sober (if there ever was a time she was sober) she was as stupid as a five pound sack of fertilizer. She made Jessica Simpson look like a good looking Hillary Clinton. I believe she was just so fucking stupid that she kept forgetting when she had medicated herself. Not to mention the pustule on her ass that was giving her a real pain in the … you get what I mean. I watched a few episodes of that reality show of hers and I really believe she was just that stupid. JD

DANIA BEACH, Fla. — For weeks, the rumors swirled, of a murder, a suicide, or some other desperate, dramatic end to an over-the-top life.

In the end, though, Anna Nicole Smith simply closed her eyes and slipped away.

The announcement Monday that the former Playboy Playmate died of an accidental drug overdose marks the end of a more than six-week investigation and halted — at least temporarily — widespread murmurs that Smith may have been murdered or simply too stricken to go on without her son Daniel, who died just five months before her.

Many theorized there was a connection between the deaths of mother and son and those assumptions won’t fade so easily, particularly with an inquest into the younger Smith’s death set to begin Tuesday in the Bahamas.

Jurors there were expected to hear from dozens of witnesses — including Dr. Cyril Wecht, a forensic pathologist hired by Smith’s family, and Smith’s lawyer-turned-companion Howard K. Stern — as they consider whether Daniel’s death should be ruled an accident, suicide or perhaps even homicide.

But in Florida on Monday, the message was clear: Smith died because of a lethal combination of drugs she likely didn’t know could kill her.

“We found nothing to indicate any foul play,” said Chief Charlie Tiger of the Seminole Police Department.

Broward County Medical Examiner Dr. Joshua Perper said the powerful sleeping drug chloral hydrate and at least eight other prescription drugs formed a lethal combination along with a case of the flu and a bacterial infection Smith had developed from injecting drugs into her buttocks.

He said Smith had been taking a lengthy list of medications, including methadone for pain and valium, but those drugs were at therapeutic levels; she also had been on several antidepressant and anti-anxiety drugs and had recently taken longevity medications, vitamin B12 and growth hormone.

Chloral hydrate, the drug primarily blamed for Smith’s death, was also a factor in the death of her idol Marilyn Monroe some 45 years ago. Smith attempted to model her career after Monroe, tattooed the icon’s image on her body and even sought to be buried near her, though she ultimately was laid to rest in the Bahamas after a long court battle over her remains.

Tiger said authorities examined laptop computers belonging to Smith and Stern, and found nothing unusual related to her death. The chief said nothing came up during an exhaustive review of tapes from hotel security cameras and from interviews with numerous witnesses.

“This is not a not-guilty,” said Krista Barth, one of Stern’s attorneys. “This is a never was.”

Smith, 39, was found unresponsive by a private nurse at about 1 p.m. on Feb. 8 in her room at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Hollywood. Smith was pronounced dead shortly afterward.

Perper said that Smith could have been saved had she been hospitalized earlier in the week — when she fell ill and eventually developed a fever of 105 degrees — simply because her drug intake could have been controlled.

“If she would have gone to the hospital she wouldn’t have died because she wouldn’t have had the opportunity to take the excessive amount of chloral hydrate,” he said.

A news release issued by lawyers for Stern said that both he and Smith’s physician urged her to get emergency treatment for her fever but she refused because “she did not want the media frenzy that follows her.”

A high school dropout in Texas, Smith went from topless dancer to Playboy Playmate of the Year, Guess jeans model and bride of 89-year-old oil man J. Howard Marshall II. She took her fight for Marshall’s estimated $500 million fortune as far as the Supreme Court, and the ongoing battle could make her infant daughter, Dannielynn, very wealthy.

___

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

(TULSA, Okla.) March 26 – A car crash leaves a 2-year-old in critical condition and Tulsa police say an illegal immigrant hit the car the child was in.

Officers arrested him following that Saturday crash for DUI and other traffic charges, but he’s now free on bond.

Police tell FOX23, they did all they could to keep him in jail.

Police say they felt this man would be a flight risk because he admitted to being an illegal immigrant and even said he wanted to go home.

They contacted the immigration and customs enforcement, or ICE, to detain him but they were refused because he didn’t meet the criteria.

Police say this is only their latest attempt to get federal help. But they will soon be changing department policy, and ICE is bound to take notice.

It seems like everyone knows someone who has been in an accident with an illegal immigrant.

And they’ll tell you what hurts most, is knowing that the person can still live here illegally after coming in contact with police.

Tulsa driver Todd Roberts says, “We just can’t continue to let these illegal immigrants run the streets with no responsibility.”

That may soon change. Instead of only reporting illegals who commit serious crimes, Tulsa police officers will pick up the phone every time they put on the handcuffs.

They just hope the federal government will be responsive to the idea. Officer Will Dalsing says, “For the most part, we are really hindered by what the federal government will go to help us.”

Officer Dalsing says the latest issue comes from immigration and customs enforcement not detaining the man responsible for the crash that injured a 2-year-old.

Now, if the child dies, he may not be around to face charges. “What are we going to do if we can’t find the guy?” Officer Dalsing says. “And he needs to be punished by not just being deported, but punished for what he’s done here.”

Police officers hope to start the new policy in a month. But they will need the mayor’s approval before it goes into affect.

The mother of the child hurt could also face child endangerment charges, because police say the child was not in a car seat.

The Tulsa County Sheriff’s Office is also doing their part to crack down on illegal immigrants. They are currently in talks with government officials to train around 20 deputies and jail workers to serve as ICE officers locally.

They hope to have those officers trained by the end of the year.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

The nightmare started for Shirley Brown and her granddaughter, Crystal, last month, when Crystal’s beloved dog Chevy went missing.

“It’s absolutely unbelievable,” Shirley says. “What a nightmare. I wish it would just stop.”

Things turned horrific when Chevy’s severed head was found – gift wrapped – on the Brown family’s doorstep.

“[Crystal] is torn inside out,” her grandmother says. “I put the pieces together, I know he did it.”

“He” is Crystal’s ex-boyfriend, Anthony Gomez, 24, who investigators say killed the dog with a chainsaw.

“She didn’t want anything to do with him,” Shirley Brown says, “and that’s what this whole thing is all about.”

People from all over the world have sent Crystal sympathy cards, including a nine-year old girl who lost her own puppy. In a letter that girl wrote: “I hope the police catch this bad person, be strong, and I pray for your dog. Sincerely, Aspen Chacon of Pueblo, Colorado.” Enclosed in the letter was a picture of Aspen holding a soccer ball.

The television show “America’s Most Wanted” posted the case on its Web site.

A $2,500 reward offered by the Humane Society of the United States quickly grew to $20,000, thanks to donations.

Dale Bartlett, the Humane Society’s deputy manager for animal cruelty issues, said it’s the most generous response the organization has ever seen to an award. He said the Browns could themselves be eligible for the award, since they apparently led police to the suspect.

Friday morning, prosecutors charged Gomez with two counts of torture or cruelty to a companion animal with intent to terrorize. If convicted, state guidelines call for a maximum sentence of four years in prison.

Prison, however, is not where Shirley Brown believes Gomez belongs.

She thinks he’s sick. “He needs to go where they can help him because he’s really ill,” Brown says. “He’s an ill person.”

Considering his innocent victim, it’s a belief that’s hard to argue with.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Ten percent of those entering O.C. jail system in the first weeks of a new program are suspected illegal immigrants.
By Garrett Therolf, Times Staff Writer
March 23, 2007

Editors Note: It says “suspected illegal immigrants” in the Los Angeles Times bi-line, yet the article clearly states that the 10% of the incoming inmates have been proven to be illegal immigrants. JD Brokencountry.com

Ten percent of inmates arriving in the Orange County sheriff’s jail system during the first five weeks of a new screening program were found to be likely illegal immigrants and were set to face hearings that could result in their deportation.

The statistics were from Jan. 19 to Feb. 25, as Sheriff Michael S. Carona began requiring that jail deputies screen all foreign nationals for immigration violations.

The findings come as law enforcement agencies around Southern California and beyond are trying to determine how many of their inmates are here illegally and should be deported.

In Los Angeles County, an increase in screeners has nearly doubled the number of inmates identified as illegal immigrants, from 3,050 in 2005 to 5,829 last year. But the county and Immigration and Customs Enforcement are screening only a fraction of the inmates in Los Angeles County jails. Last year, screeners interviewed nearly 10,000 of the 170,000 inmates who went through L.A. County jails, estimating that more than 20% of the jail population was in the country illegally.

By contrast, Orange County now screens all inmates entering the jails. Jail deputies booked 6,160 people from throughout the county during the period, and they found that 639 did not appear to have legal status in the United States. They will be referred to ICE after their cases go through the legal system and they serve any resulting prison time.

Of those detained for ICE, 425 were arrested on suspicion of felonies — 56 of them on suspicion of aggravated felonies — and 214 for alleged misdemeanors.

The Sheriff’s Department said detailed information about the alleged infractions would be released but was not available Thursday.

Those detained were mostly from Latin America but included people from Egypt, Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan, Germany, Romania, Vietnam, Thailand and South Korea.

In previous years, ICE authorities were stationed in Orange County jails, but the agents interviewed only 20% of foreign nationals in 2005.

To buttress the search for illegal immigrants, Carona won ICE approval to train sheriff’s deputies to aid in the deportation effort.

“I have stated many times before that the intended results of the Cross-Designation Program are reduced crime, reduced jail overcrowding, and reduced cases for our court system — all of which will serve our residents and businesses well,” Carona said in a written statement.

“We are on the right track, and I look forward to sharing our continued successes in the coming months.”

Amin David, who heads Los Amigos of Orange County, a Latino advocacy group, said illegal immigrants were becoming frightened to talk to the police. He said more than 500 people recently attended a community meeting in Costa Mesa, a city that operates a similar program in its jail.

David said the attendees were advised by an immigration attorney to limit their conversations with police when questioned on the street or in their homes.

“The attendees were advised to only give your name to the authorities and not to divulge anything else — don’t respond to questions,” David said.

David worried, though, that the sheriff’s program would cause illegal immigrants to refrain from reporting crimes.

“We kind of fear that this chilling effect is taking hold,” he said.

Ryan Burris, a Carona spokesman, said, “The sheriff doesn’t think that this program is going to stop people from coming to police to report a crime out of fear that they will be deported, because it’s not the goal of the program.”

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

This is yet another example of the media trying to tell their liberal cohorts in Washington D.C. what to do. I don’t give two shits if families are being torn apart. The fact of the matter is that these kids can go back to Mexico with their parents if they want to. They shouldn’t have criminal parents in the first place.

Why won’t the national media point out the fact that the parents are teaching their children that laws and rules don’t matter? After all, they are here illegally and their children grow up knowing this. Gee, I wonder if this could be why the crime rates in predominantly hispanic communities is so high. Will the proponents of illegal immigration try to deny that FACT too? These people come here and have children for that very reason. So the court will stop them from being deported. Stop already with the “the poor children” routine. JD

HOUSTON – They are the hidden side of the government’s stepped-up efforts to track down and deport illegal immigrants – toddlers stranded at day care centers or handed over to ill-equipped relatives; siblings suddenly left in charge of younger brothers and sisters.

When illegal-immigrant parents are swept up in raids on homes and workplaces, the children are sometimes left behind – a complication that underscores the difficulty in enforcing immigration laws against people who have put down roots and begun raising families in the United States.

Three million American-born children have at least one parent who is an illegal immigrant; one in 10 American families has mixed immigration status, meaning at least one member is an immigrant here illegally, according to the Pew Center for Hispanic Research and the office of U.S. Rep. Jose Serrano, D-N.Y. Children born in the United States are automatically American citizens and are not subject to deportation.

This past week in Massachusetts, most of the 361 workers picked up in a raid at a New Bedford leather-goods factory that made vests and backpacks for the U.S. military were women with children, setting off what Democratic Gov. Deval Patrick called a “humanitarian crisis.”

Community activists scrambled to locate the children, offer infant-care tips to fathers unfamiliar with warming formula and changing diapers, and gather donations of baby supplies. One baby who was breast-feeding had to be hospitalized for dehydration because her mother remained in detention, authorities said.

Child-care arrangements had to be made for at least 35 youngsters.

Officials of the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement division released at least 60 of the workers who were sole caregivers to children, but more than 200 were sent to detention centers in Texas and New Mexico.

“What is going to happen to the children? These children are American-born,” said Helena Marques, executive director of the Immigrant Assistance Center in New Bedford. “There are hundreds of children out there without their moms, in tremendous need. These babies have become the victims of a problem that legislators can’t seem to fix.”

One mother was located in Texas after her 7-year-old child called a state hot line set up to help reunite the families, authorities said. The Massachusetts governor said the woman would be returned to Massachusetts.

Massachusetts sent 37 social workers to Texas on Saturday to interview some of the women under arrest. Massachusetts Health and Human Services Secretary JudyAnn Bigby said the parents must be interviewed to make sure their youngsters are staying with responsible adults.

Authorities said some of the women might be so afraid their youngsters will be taken away that they have refused to disclose they have children.

ICE officials defended their handling of the raid, saying ICE made arrangements in advance with social service agencies to care for the children. ICE spokesman Marc Raimondi said all immigrants arrested by ICE are interviewed to determine if they are the sole parent of their children. ICE then can grant humanitarian releases, as they did in 60 cases in Massachusetts.

“We can only base our response by what we are learning by (the state Department of Social Services). What DSS has told us is they are not aware of any child who was left in an inappropriate or risky setting, nor have they had to put any child in foster care,” Raimondi said.

As for the parents’ ultimate fate, being a single parent or the family breadwinner offers no special protection against deportation, said another ICE spokesman, Mike Keegan.

“They made a decision to come into the country illegally,” he said. “It’s hard to believe that someone would not know of the consequences when they get caught.”

U.S. Rep. William Delahunt said Sunday there would be a Congressional investigation into the raid.

Many of the New Bedford children are in the care of friends or relatives, who are juggling families and jobs of their own. One woman, who asked not to be identified for fear it would put her family in greater legal jeopardy, is looking after the three children of her sister, one of the workers detained in the raid. The children’s father and another sister take turns watching the children.

“My sister calls every morning asking about her children,” the woman said in Spanish. “She is usually a happy person, but now she is so depressed because she is separated from them, and they are so small.”

Two of the children, 4-year-old Angel and 1-year-old Amanda, are U.S. citizens. A 17-year-old came with his mother from Guatemala. Their mother, who came to the United States 10 years ago, has worked in the factory for two years.

“The children go to sleep crying and asking for their mother. They feel her absence,” the woman said. “And all we can do is wait and wait, and hope they don’t deport her.”

Under pressure to crack down on illegal immigrants, ICE has intensified enforcement activity around the country. The efforts have yielded results – since last May, one particular crackdown, called Operation Return to Sender, has snared 13,000 people, while other federal initiatives have caught thousands of others. But the raids have led to a growing outcry from immigrant advocates and activists who say thousands of families are being split apart.

After nearly 1,300 people were arrested in December in raids at Swift & Co. meatpacking plants in Texas, Colorado, Minnesota, Iowa, Nebraska and Utah, community activists reported hearing of scores of children left on their own. Swift donated $300,000 to United Way agencies to help the families affected by the raids.

Since the December raids hit the Swift plant at Greeley, Colo., Catholic Charities in Denver has provided assistance to about 160 families or individuals, said Ernie Giron, the charity’s vice president for mission and ministry. That has included rent or mortgage checks, helping with utility bills, and providing phone and grocery store gift cards.

Giron said the number of people seeking aid has begun to drop from its peak in mid-February. “But a number of families are still hanging on just trying to get through until they have to make some kind of life choice in terms of which way they’re going,” he said.

In Houston, a newly formed coalition of community groups, churches and advocacy organizations is scrambling to help dozens of families struggling to stay afloat after a husband or wife was taken away. And residents of an apartment complex in Houston that has been raided several times have formed an emergency child care network, which jumps in to care for children left alone by a deported parent.

“The Department of Homeland Security is just carrying out the law they have to carry out. Under the law, there is no legal basis for considering the rights of families. Congress may have to act for that to change,” Urban Institute demographer Randolph Capps said.

Rep. Serrano is sponsoring a bill now before the House Judiciary Committee that would give immigration judges more discretion in weighing the effect on families when deporting an illegal immigrant.

But any immigration reform legislation probably will have a tough time passing Congress in the current political climate, said Bob Stein, a political scientist at Rice University in Houston.

“Immigration reform seemed like something Democrats and Republicans could agree on, but partisan fighting and the presidential campaigns make it hard for any candidate to carry the battle,” he said.

Until 1996, immigration judges were allowed to consider family hardship when deciding whether to deport legal residents charged with certain crimes. That changed under an immigration reform law.

Luissana Santibanez, a 23-year-old student at the University of Texas in Austin, has been taking care of three younger siblings while their mother, Sergia, held in a Houston immigration detention center for nearly 18 months, fights deportation.

Sergia Santibanez, a legal resident for more than 15 years, was ordered deported after she served four months behind bars for transporting illegal immigrants. She said the illegal immigrants were three friends who asked for a ride and that she didn’t know their immigration status and never asked.

“The hardest thing is that my children are suffering and I can’t do anything about it,” Sergia, who worked in a factory and cleaned houses before her arrest, said by telephone from the detention center. “This will destroy their future.”

Luissana has been supporting her two brothers and one sister on food stamps and student grants. All are U.S. citizens.

“As a country, we should not put our youngest citizens at risk of hunger, homelessness and living without parents,” said Ali Noorani, executive director of the Massachusetts Immigrant and Refugee Advocacy Coalition. “Our immigration system has to be squared with values.”

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

BUFFALO, NEW YORK – A 29-year-old Mexican farm worker who has been deported at least six times for illegally entering the United States will spend 15 months in federal prison.

Vincente Santiago-Castro then will be sent back to Mexico once again.

Santiago-Castro, whose case was described as sadly typical by federal court authorities, was sentenced Monday by U.S. District Judge William M. Skretny.

U.S. Border Patrol agents arrested Santiago-Castro last Sept. 13 in Eden. The illegal alien had been working at a nursery in the Southern Tier.

Speaking through an interpreter, he apologized to the judge for his actions.

“He came from a very poor town in Mexico, where they don’t even have electricity, and he came here to work,” said Marianne Mariano, a federal public defender who represented Santiago-Castro. “He’s been sending $200 a month to his parents and two children back home.

“It’s a very sad case, because his family depends on that money.”

According to court papers filed by the Homeland Security Department, Santiago-Castro was deported from the United States on at least six previous occasions between 1998 and 2001.

Joseph B. Mistrett, who heads the public defender’s office, said he has represented many men in similar circumstances to those of Santiago- Castro.

“Most of them are individuals who come to the United States because they’re in dire circumstances in Mexico or other countries,” Mistrett said. “They generally come here to pick apples or tomatoes and send money back to their families. They don’t live in luxury while they’re here, either.”

Assistant U.S. Attorney Gregory L. Brown represented the government at Monday’s sentencing. He said Skretny sentenced Santiago-Castro at the low end of advisory sentencing guidelines.

The government has been trying to crack down on an estimated 12 million illegal aliens who live in the United States. An estimated 40,000 migrant farm workers — some of them illegals — work in Central and Western New York each year.

Last summer, U.S. Immigration & Customs Enforcement agents conducted several large roundups of illegal aliens in the region.

Most of the illegal aliens arrested in such roundups are sent back to their home countries after noncriminal proceedings, authorities said. But because of his previous deportations, Santiago-Castro was prosecuted as a felon for illegal re-entry.

“I think his case is very ironic, because just last week, you had President Bush in Mexico, talking to the Mexican president about a guest worker program,” Mariano said. “That’s just the kind of program that would have benefited this man. Now, he’ll probably never be allowed to take part in a program like that.”

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

This is the cost in Suffolk County, New York. In Los Angeles we have tenfold the number of illegal aliens. Look at their projected costs of educating people that don’t even belong in the United States. Brokencountry.

With local school districts getting ready to unveil their proposed budgets for the 2007-2008 academic year, some are expressing worry over an issue that they believe is causing school taxes to rise – illegal immigration.

“The truth of the matter is it’s very costly, and we get no help from the state or federal government,” said Patchogue-Medford Superintendent Michael Mostow. “We’re not allowed to consider whether a child is here legally or not. We’re obligated to educate them, it doesn’t matter what their status is, that’s the law.”
According to a 1982 US Supreme Court ruling, school districts are “prohibited” from “barring access to a student on the basis of legal status or alleged legal status.” However, the costs that come along with educating those children has been the subject of debate recently, with residents and school officials searching for answers.

A 2006 study done by the Federation for American Immigration Reform – a non-profit organization that is pushing for immigration reform on a national level – showed that illegal immigrants have been costing New York State school district taxpayers a total of “at least $1.5 billion per year.” However, that number increases when US-born children of illegal immigrants are taken into account. Those children carry an additional expense of $2.8 billion annually, according to the report, and bring the overall figure up to $4.3 billion.

“The states are really feeling the effects of the federal government’s negligence to control the borders,” said Bob Dane, press secretary for FAIR. “It’s fundamentally unfair for children of legal residents to suffer lower quality in the classrooms because of parents [who have come here illegally and] who’ve had children here.”
In response to these concerns, NYS Assemblyman Marc Alessi (D-Wading River) is requesting school districts in his area to provide his office with the number of illegal immigrants they believe they are educating. “I’m going to need a detailed list of who they feel is undocumented and the unfunded mandates associated with them,” Alessi said. “Nobody’s been able to back it up with any factual data. For me to be an effectual legislator, I have to have all the facts.”

However, this might be a difficult task, as the 1982 Supreme Court ruling bars school districts from “treating students disparately for residency determination purposes on the basis of their undocumented status; inquiring about a student’s immigration status, including requiring documentation of a student’s legal status at initial registration or at any other time; [and] making inquiries from a student or his/her parents which may expose their legal status.”

“On the one hand, they know there’s illegal activity going on and, on the other, they’re bound by confidentiality,” explained New York State Assemblywoman Pat Eddington (WF-Medford). “It’s a horrible problem that has been thrown in our faces and placed in our laps by the federal government.”
School administrators concurred. “We’re not allowed to release that kind of information,” said Mostow, adding that he is now requesting the landlord’s signature as part of the enrollment process. “We’re hoping that initiative will stop multiple families from living in one home.”

Sachem School District Superintendent Charles Murphy said school officials can “get a feel” for which students are here legally and which are not, as students do have to prove they live within the district itself. Some of the ways parents must verify that their children reside within the school district’s boundaries, according to Murphy, include providing rent receipts, a mortgage or lease agreement, utility bills or an affidavit from the landlord. “If they have a mortgage, you know they’re fairly established, but if they’re going back and trying to get an affidavit, they could be illegal – but we’re not allowed to ask,” he said.

But state Senator Ken LaValle (R-Selden) believes those who are attending school districts in this country should be required to show proof that they are here legally. “This is an issue where people try to be politically correct and pussyfoot around the issue,” he said. “People use things such as privacy or confidentiality, but the time has come, particularly on the federal level, to do something about this … It puts the school districts in a hell of a bind, but if a person was doing something illegal, wouldn’t the school district report that individual? I think we have a responsibility to provide those names to the federal government.”

The Sachem School District includes Farmingville, an area that officials note has had its share of issues with illegal immigrants in the past. However, Murphy said his school district does not have a large illegal alien population. “Some people would perceive [the] Sachem [School District] to have a large [illegal immigrant] population based on the migrant worker issue,” he said, “but these people are mostly single men whose families are elsewhere in the world.”

However, Mostow said the Patchogue-Medford School District is feeling the impact of illegal aliens coming into the system. Stating that his district’s population of 8,700 students includes approximately 1,800 immigrants “at varying levels,” Mostow said this number has jumped markedly over the past five years. “We went from 4% to 20%,” he said, noting that, due to federal law, he does not know for sure how many of these students are illegal aliens.

In terms of the price tag these numbers carry, Mostow said that for the 2007-2008 budget, the school district will have to add five new English as a Second Language teachers – jumping the number of ESL educators from 16 to 21 – as well as two bilingual teachers, to the roster. “Just for salaries and fringe benefits, that’s going to cost us [a total of] $1,768,000 [for all the ESL and bilingual teachers],” Mostow said. “That alone is almost a 2% increase in the budget.”

With state officials pointing the finger at the federal government, US Congressman Tim Bishop (D-Coram) said he is “optimistic” that a bill he is sponsoring will help address this issue. “I’m hoping we’ll be moving on immigration reform some time this spring,” he said. Noting that the legislation being drafted now would include a “path to citizenship” for illegal immigrants already here, Bishop added that the bill also would mandate “the payment of back taxes” and a “substantial fine.” This money, he said, would then be distributed to local governments, which would, in turn, be obligated to pass the funding on to the entities that are affected by this issue – including school districts.

Some believe challenging the 1982 US Supreme Court ruling is the solution. “The first thing school districts should be allowed to do is find out exactly how many students are here illegally, and then find out how much that is costing taxpayers,” said Medford resident Arthur Francis. “Once we know what kind of dollar figure we’re looking at, then we can say to ourselves, ‘Is it worth going to the Supreme Court?’ If it’s costing us a lot of money, and we have to go all the way to the Supreme Court, we should. Those coming here illegally shouldn’t be a burden on taxpaying citizens to the extent where they are hurting our quality of life.”

“It’s established federal law,” Bishop responded. “Certainly someone has the right to challenge that law, but I would not support a challenge to it … If the alternative is to round up these people and send them back, that’s never going to happen. In my opinion, this legislation [in Congress] is the only realistic alternative.”
Another concern school districts raised were federal mandates – particularly the No Child Left Behind Act, which has a number of requirements that school administrators say are becoming harder to attain. “After one year in the country, [ESL] students have to take an English language test, which brings [the school district's overall] scores down,

” Mostow said. “If you pull that population out, we’re doing very well.”
“The No Child Left Behind Act doesn’t provide any kind of funds for school districts, so the burden is on the taxpayers,” Eddington said. “School districts are being blamed for the failure of students because they don’t speak English well, but where is the federal government?”
Acknowledging that the federal government has “fallen far short” of the “promises” it made in the No Child Left

Behind Act, Bishop said, “We’re going to reauthorize the law this year. One of the things we have to look at is whether [some of the requirements are] reasonable or not.”
When asked whether school districts should be mandated to ask for proof of citizenship when a student is enrolled, and be allowed to pass that information along to the proper authorities, some officials said that would be placing an unfair burden on the educational system. “Our teachers and our school districts are not the immigration police,” Eddington commented.

“I think the responsibility lies with the federal government,” said NYS Assemblyman Fred Thiele (R-Bridgehampton). “This is just another responsibility school districts have to confront … and it becomes a major cost.”

Thiele said using local laws, such as housing codes, to fight illegal immigration are “more symbolic statements than effective policy. That doesn’t address the underlying problem, which is the inability or unwillingness of the federal government to secure our borders.”

Frustrated with some of the provisions in federal law that preclude school districts from reporting on illegal immigration, LaValle said the federal government should take another look at its laws. “In every other aspect where the word ‘illegal’ is used, there are consequences, but there seems to be none here,” he said. “I think we’re going to have to revisit all this, because it just doesn’t make any sense.”

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

By Robert Klein Engler

Much has been written recently about the New York Times editorial describing an ICE raid that apprehended illegal immigrants working in Boston. The Times editorial claims that, “A screaming baby girl has been forcibly weaned from breast milk and taken, dehydrated, to an emergency room, so that the nation’s borders will be secure (March 15, 2007).”

This editorial has fired up the debate about just how reliable the left-leaning New York Times is in reporting the news. We should not, however, be diverted from the story about the ICE raids and the arrest of the employer who hired these illegal immigrants, most of them women. If we dwell on the alleged misrepresentation in the editorial, and make that the story, then we miss the real story. That real story is the ever increasing use of children and anchor babies as human shields by illegal immigrants.

International law considers the use of human shields to protect targets a war crime. Nevertheless, human shields have been used by the Iraqis during the first Gulf War. The Israeli Defense Forces claim that Hezbollah and Hamas used human shields to stop the IDF from shooting at gunmen and rocket launchers. Now, illegal immigrant women are using their children as human shields to prevent their deportation from the United States.

The use of children as human shields to prevent deportation is immoral on many levels. The recent arrests in Boston, and the prolonged case of Elvira Arellano’s sanctuary in a Chicago church demonstrate this immorality.

It is obvious that many of the women who come to the United States illegally know that they stand a better chance of not being deported if they use their children as human shields. From the point of view of both secular and religious morality, human beings–especially children–should not be used as a means to an end. Children are ends unto themselves, and are not pawns used in the game of deportation. Editors ought to wonder why the Catholic Church does not speak out about this abuse of family values.

In most immigration cases which use children as human shields, we find single women or women whose husbands are missing and probably still in Mexico. These children are living in situations without fathers. The first question that ought to be asked by the editors at the New York Times, is where are the fathers and why are they not supporting their families?

Are murderers and robbers to be let free because they have children who cannot be without a parent? We never hear this reported or editorialized about. Is the New York Times telling us that human shields and anchor babies are good when they protect political interests, but are bad when they do not?

A better way would be to see the objective evil done to children when their parents bring them illegally into the United States and use them as anchor babies or human shields. The women who do this are not victims, but immigration terrorists. The New York Times editors ought to report that many illegal aliens not only break our immigration laws, but are also cowards who hide behind their children.

Robert Klein Engler lives in Chicago, and has been a teacher at Daley College and Roosevelt College. His book, “A Winter of Words,” about the turmoil at Daley College, is available from amazon.com.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

There are many things that piss me off on an almost daily basis. Most people get angry about all sorts of things, but most are to frightened to voice an opinion because they are afraid of losing acceptance from the people they perceive as friends and the groups they tend to gravitate to. A quick word of advice; People that don’t let you voice an opinion of your own, of which you are entitled to as a free thinking human being, are not really your friends. They are charlatans themselves. Posers. They consider their own opinions so lofty that they despise anyone that doesn’t think as they do. On to the pet peeves.

Lets cover driving first.

1. People that think they are in their reclining chair while they drive. Talking on the phone, putting on make-up, shaving, rolling fatties, drinking beers, etc. Let me tell you something butt wad, focus on the road asshole. Living in Los Angeles, not a day goes by that I don’t see some idiot nearly kill someone or kill themselves doing something stupid while driving.

2. Changing lanes without first looking to see if there is anyone (me) in the next lane. Listen to me dumb shit. Your turn signal does not entitle you to your own little piece of the freeway. Your turn signal is to indicate to others that you intend to change lanes. It doesn’t give you cart blanche to just cut people off (me) and send them into the center divider.

3. Red lights mean STOP! This one happens to me at least three time a day. When approaching an intersection to make a right turn on a red light, you are supposed to stop! The red light doesn’t mean slow down, look to see who your going to force to slam on their brakes and then cut them off. IT MEANS STOP!!! Same thing with STOP signs. Note that the word “STOP” is in capital letters asshole. I drive a 3/4 ton Chevy four door that weighs three tons. If I hit your narrow ass in your Beamer, your dead. All the air bag in the world aren’t going to save you.

4. One more … Your rolling along at 20 mph over the speed limit when some idiot comes racing up behind you, tailgates you for two seconds then races around you only to get in front of you, slam on his brakes and make a right turn. I chase them fuckers down and return the favor. (P.S. In Los Angeles there is no such thing as road rage. We like to call it retribution.)

Next topic: Alarmists.

Let me tell you all something. We are all going to die. There is nothing that is going to kill the earth. The idea that humans have become so magnanimous that we think we can kill a planet is absolutely amazing!

1. Start with the obvious. Global warming. No such thing. I have a client named James Boreland. He is 97 years old. He was born and raised in the greater Los Angeles area. He swears that nothing has changed with the exception that the air is cleaner today in Los Angeles than it was when he was a boy … when there were NO automobiles … and only a quarter million people. Today in Los Angeles county there are thirteen million people and more than 6 million cars. Yet the air is cleaner. Go figure.

2. Al Gore. Al Gore is an idiot. He talks to the general public like they are third graders. Al Gore is part of the global warming religion because he stands to make BILLIONS of dollars if he can get Congress to pass legislation to stop something that doesn’t exist. He has three separate companies he has invested in or created to reap untold millions off of the ignorance of all the rest of the global warming religion. Just look at Al Gore as a modern day Jim (and Tammy Faye) Baker. Let not forget that Al created the internet.

3. The anti-war crowd. These retards don’t know shit about shit yet they condemn something they don’t have the intelligence to understand. Go load another bowl, dude. Every time the United States has to stand up for freedom these people pack up their sleeping bags and bongs and hit the road to piss and moan like children in a rowdy preschool. Terrorist could be lighting their homes (vans and tents) on fire and they would be listening to the Grateful Dead, taking bong hits and convincing each other that the reason they are being attacked is because of George Bush. Fucking idiots.

4. Democrats. I love when these people are in power because everything becomes a crisis. They take their marching orders from the media and they are afraid of their own shadow. I have a theory that they were those kids that used to get their asses kicked all the time because they were such cowards that they emanated fear. People sense fear and they exploit it. Look at gang members…

4. The “homeless” crowd. Note that there were no homeless people for the entire eight years that Bill Clinton ( a great president but a bad liar) was President. Within two weeks of George Bush taking office there were homeless people all over the place. When will society realize that some people are just too lazy to work?

5. Teachers Unions. What a bill of good these people are feeding the American public. They have everyone believing that they have it so hard and they are terribly underpaid. Its ridiculous how easy these people have it. In my district (As well as most of California) they make $75,000.00 a year plus they enjoy some of the best benefits in the country. They work 182 days a year and have summers off. Half a year and they complain that they are under paid! They get one day a week called “minimum day” to correct their papers and they call in sick all the time. Yet when they go on strike for more money it’s always “for the children.” NO ITS NOT!!! ITS FOR YOUR VACATION IN MAUI!!! Friggin liars. Speaking of children …

6. The “It’s for the children” crowd. It’s never for the children. Its for money. Lets be intellectually honest about it. Most people that go to Washington for anything involving children are there crying that they need more money. Once they get that money the problem mysteriously goes away. Until a few years go by and then its for the children again. Meanwhile are kids are as dumb as a sack of fertilizer and we are constantly dumbing down standards to justify the stupidity.

7. The rain forest crowd. I heard that the rain forest in the Amazon was being cut down at 100 acres a minute. I did the math. This would mean that the entire rain forest would be gone in less than two years. Amazingly enough its still there 20 years later. In fact its growing back faster than they can cut it down! These people have collected billions of dollars and made a career out of stealing money from the stupid people that are dumb enough to buy into this nonsense in the first place.

8. ALL ENVIRONMENTALISTS! A true environmentalist would commit suicide. Why? Because their mere existence is a blight on the planet according to them. They take a shit, they are polluting. They sneeze, they are polluting. They breathe, they are polluting. They fart, they are polluting. They sweat, they are polluting. Kill yourselves. You’d be doing the world and all of it’s inhabitant a huge solid.

Now on to Hollywood. The elite of our society. These people are so damn stupid that they can’t think they way out of a paper bag, yet they tell us how we should live. I’ll list them in the order of which ones I have the most disdain for.

1. Barbra Streisand. What an idiot. Go read her blog. I have chronicled her stupidity here on this blog many times but it bears repeating. Babs flies on her own private jet that consumes fossil fuel at an alarming rate. Babs limo’s about town. Babs cut down some of the most pristine coastline in Malibu to build her 11 bedroom mansion with 9 fireplaces in which burns the wood from the 87 native eucalyptus and oak trees she cut down to build her two mile driveway to her house. Yet she constantly tells us how we need to do more to heal the environment. I hope you have a stroke Barbra.

2. Angelina Jolie. Adopt me bitch! I want to lead a privileged life and grow up to be a gay heroin addict. What a retard. She would be doing more good if she would donate food and money but she adopts kids who’s lives will be corrupted by Hollywood.

3. Jerry Lewis. Funny in his day. But did you know that fat fucker pays himself 11 million a year from the Muscular dystrophy gig? What a charlatan. Charity is supposed to be from the heart, not the wallet Jerry.

4. Alec Baldwin. He should move out of America like he said he would if George Bush was elected.

5. Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon. Both great actors. I’m not so limited in my thinking or so full of hatred and self loathing like most polarized group thinkers that I can’t acknowledge these people and their true talents. All of the people mentioned here are good at their craft. But these two are blithering idiots. When will you liberal Hollywood idiots realize that some people are just bad people and can’t be rehabilitated? If they kill they should be killed.

6. Ed Asner. See above.

7. Martin Sheen. Poor Martin. He runs hell bent for election into causes without even knowing what the hell he is protesting. A great talent indeed, but a blithering idiot.

8. Oprah Winfrey. What a fucking moron. She is the smartest dumb shit in this crowd. But to be duped by the whole “Mad Cow” thing and James Frey and the list goes on and on. Then to add insult to injury she builds schools in AFRICA! America is the country that has been so good to her and made a billionaire but she ignores the children of America and chooses to help Africa instead. What a bitch.

9. All celebrities that use they status in society to unfairly influence the stupid people of the world.

There are however a few of these people that do a lot of good for humanity and they should also be acknowledged.

1. Ed Bagley Jr. Unlike Leonardo Di Caprio he actually practices what he preaches. He drives and electric car, has solar electricity coming into his house and does not live in excess like most of the bloviating Hollywood idiots.

2. Tom Selleck. He has quietly supported the people’s right to keep and bear arms. For you retards that just jump on bandwagons, that would be the second amendment to the Constitution.

3. Bono, who has been quite vocal about helping as many people in as many parts of the world as he can with his own money as well as money raised publicly. This guy is truly amazing. Set aside his musical talent, Bono spends a huge amount of his time trying to get us all to be more aware of what’s going on and to do something about it. And he does it without being a group thinker. Politically he’s a liberal, but like myself he doesn’t care about political ideology when it comes to the people he associates with or is seen in public with. Amazing.

4. Bob Geldof of Boomtown Rats fame. He put together a little thing called LIVE AID and continues to be instrumental in helping to feed the starving people around the world. And he does it with little fanfare or recognition.

There are more but I’ve been typing for 40 minutes now and I have to go to the gym. JD

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

MICROSOFT’s formerly tame blogger has bitten the software company that made his name when it employed him as a “technology evangelist”.

Robert Scoble writes the Scobleizer web log, one of the most-read sources of technology commentary on the internet.

He owes his status to the three years he spent at Microsoft, where he was given free rein to comment on the company’s affairs from the inside. The Economist magazine has credited Scoble with playing a significant role in softening the software giant’s former reputation for monopolistic bullying.

In the past, Scoble has tended to be sympathetic about Microsoft’s failings. However, he was provoked into stinging criticism last week after a series of triumphalist remarks, including some disparaging comments about Google made by Steve Ballmer, Microsoft’s chief executive.

At a “global summit” of its most-valued software developers, Microsoft repeatedly declared that it would “win” in search and other parts of its Windows Live internet strategy.

“The words are empty,” Scoble responded. “Microsoft’s internet execution sucks (on the whole). Its search sucks. Its advertising sucks. If that’s ‘in it to win’, then I don’t get it.”

He continued: “Microsoft isn’t going away. Don’t get me wrong. They have record profits, record sales, all that. But on the inter-net? Come on.

“Microsoft: stop the talk. Ship a better search, a better advertising system than Google, a better hosting service than Amazon, a better cross-platform web development ecosystem than Adobe, and get some services out there that are innovative.”

Scoble’s comments reflect wider concerns — shared by some Microsoft insiders — that the poorly understood Windows Live initiative is failing to make the impact expected when it was unveiled 18 months ago.

Windows Live was pitched as the centrepiece of Microsoft’s response to Google and other companies offering web-based services. It was seen to be a key focus for Ray Ozzie, who has replaced Bill Gates as Microsoft’s chief software architect.

Talking to Stanford University business school students in California, Ballmer said Google had built only one good business and “everything else is sort of cute” — in other words largely irrelevant.

This also provoked Scoble’s ire. “You’re up against a formidable competitor and one you’ve never seen before that has some real, significant weapons that you can’t deal with.”

LiveSide, a website that tracks the development of Windows Live, is among those who are unimpressed. “Windows Live isn’t making much of a dent in the marketplace,” it says on its Our View page. “It’s a nontopic. Market research shows Live Search to be losing share if anything, and certainly not gaining.

“What Windows Live lacks, specifically, is an identity. No one can describe it, no one from Microsoft has even tried.”

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

Public masterbator Mario Vasquez
Former “American Idol” finalist Mario Vasquez is facing accusations that he tried to masturbate in front of a male employee in a bathroom on the set of the hit show in February 2005.

Shortly thereafter, Vasquez mysteriously dropped out of “Idol,” citing personal reasons.

According to the lawsuit filed in Los Angeles County Superior Court and obtained by TMZ, Vazquez allegedly “sexually harassed” Magdaleno Olmos, assistant accountant for Fremantle Media, the company that produces American Idol.

In the lawsuit, Olmos claims “Vazquez stared lasciviously, smiled lasciviously … and on one occasion followed him into a bathroom … knocked on the door of the plaintiff’s stall and made eye contact through the space in the stall door.”

The lawsuit alleges that Vazquez “started to rub his genitals over his pants. Attempting to leave the bathroom, Olmos opened the door of the stall and saw Vazquez standing in front of him with his pants down masturbating.”

According to the documents, Vazquez pushed Olmos “further into the stall and continued masturbating with one hand and trying to pull down Olmos’ pants with another hand.”

Olmos claims that he tried to “cover his body with his hands” but Vazquez touched his “chest and stomach underneath his shirt, and Olmos’ “genitals” as Vazquez “attempted to unzip” Olmos’ pants.

Vazquez then allegedly asked Olmos “if he wanted oral sex.”

In the lawsuit, Olmos claims that as he “managed to get out of the stall, and attempted to leave the bathroom,” Vazquez, grabbed his arm “in an effort to stop him.” Vazquez continued to call Olmos to come back as Vazquez “stood in the bathroom with his pants still down.”

In the suit, Olmos claims that he tried to report the incident to a superior named Eric LaPointe, who allegedly responded by telling Olmos that “he was crazy” and “repeatedly threatening to fire” him. A few months after the incident, Olmos claims he was “terminated.”

In addition to suing Vazquez, Olmos has named FOX Entertainment and Fremantle Media as defendants in his lawsuit for wrongful termination.

Reps from FOX tell TMZ, “We haven’t been served, but we wouldn’t comment on pending litigation.”

Calls to Vazquez’s attorney, and reps from “American Idol” on behalf of the defendants, have not yet been returned.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.

Warning: array_keys() [function.array-keys]: The first argument should be an array in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1310

Warning: shuffle() expects parameter 1 to be array, null given in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1311

Warning: Invalid argument supplied for foreach() in /u/www/sites/brokencountry.com/www/wordpress/wp-content/plugins/simple-tags/inc/client.php on line 1312

CHINO HILLS – The FBI is investigating whether a Los Angeles County firefighter in jail in Michigan on charges he tried to have sex with a 5-year-old girl may have also molested a child here.

Brian Lee Flaherty, of Chino Hills, is facing federal charges in Detroit alleging he crossed state lines to induce a child to have sex and trafficked child pornography.

He was arrested during an undercover sting operation last month after he flew from Los Angeles to Detroit allegedly to meet the child.

Federal agents said they found evidence during that investigation suggesting Flaherty, 37, may have had sexual contact in Southern California with the infant child of a friend.

An FBI spokeswoman confirmed Wednesday that agents are pursuing those leads, though she declined to elaborate.

“I’m not going to comment beyond that because it is an ongoing investigation,” spokeswoman Laura Eimiller said.

Flaherty has worked for the Los Angeles County Fire Department for six years. He was most recently assigned to Station 7 in West Hollywood. He is now on paid leave pending an investigation into his case.

According to court records, Flaherty responded in January to an Internet posting from
Advertisement
an undercover detective in Michigan posing as a single mother interested in finding a man to have sex with her two young children.

They say he corresponded with the undercover officer for more than a month before he finally flew to Detroit on Feb. 23 to meet the “mother” and have sex with her 5-year-old daughter.

Detectives arrested him at the airport.

According to an FBI affidavit filed in the case, Flaherty sent the undercover detective some 25 pornographic photos and two videos of children during the six weeks they corresponded.

Some of the images appeared to be of children as young as 1 year old, according to the affidavit.

Investigators say Flaherty told the detective an infant depicted in some of the sexually graphic photos is a child he occasionally baby-sits for a friend.

The affidavit does not provide further details.

Flaherty remains in jail in Michigan without bail.

[Post to Twitter] Tweet This Post 

No tags for this post.